It took 3 months for the external review before return to the editorial department. It took one month for the evaluation by the editor. There were 3 reviewers, the comments of the former two reviewers were very positive. The first reviewer suggested acceptance after minor revision; the second reviewer may not understand some of the content, but reviewed carefully and asked some problems in the method part, and some revision of pictures and narratives, and suggested acceptance after major revision. The third reviewer raised negative opinions. The review comments were only written in a paragraph, and less than 200 words. In the end, the editor rejected it.

(3) Thank | 然乌

I had submitted manuscript twice ~ the first review lasted for 2 to 3 months. ~ submit 2019-06-30; with the editor today under review 2019-07-04; first comment 2019-09-04. The review comments for minor revisions are very professional, which gives me a very good impression. The reviewer also discussed some things with me. It can be said that the things that were ignored in the field, my two bosses were also very interested, so... It was obviously a minor revision, but it was sent back after discussion for a month. Back 2019-09-29; with editor 2019-10-07; accept 2019-10-15.

(4) Thank | 菠萝百香果

For time being, the status of my article “under review” has changed three times in the system, it should have been three review comments updated. Jan 3 2019, submission; Jan 3 2019, with editor; Jan 4 2019, changed to under review; Jan 19 2019, under review, date changed; Feb 16 2019, under review, date changed; Feb 29 2019, under review, date changed. It was still under review now. Why hasn't the editor decided yet? Three reviewers should be enough, when will it be “review completed” or “decision with editor”.

(0) Thank | 爱笑的小飞鱼

Large number of submissions and high overall quality.

(10) Thank | 落地成盒

Invited 8, accepted 5, waiting for the draw.

(0) Thank | wuhr快快毕业

3.9 Under review
0410 5 reviewers have completed the review and are awaiting processing.

(0) Thank | wuhr快快毕业

2025.2.4 with editor
2025.3.9 Under Review
2025.4.8 0/1/2

(0) Thank | 泽

2024/09/10, submitted;
2025/02/27, Major Revision;
2025/03/14, revision submitted;
2025/03/27, Accept.

(0) Thank | Voruarn0362

The long-established authoritative top journal in the field of photogrammetry and remote sensing requires submitted papers to be highly innovative, logically rigorous and clear, and experimentally validated with full objectivity.

(0) Thank | liuyuan

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 杉山

Incorrectly written.
2025-01-27 manuscript submitted.

(0) Thank | Bruce.xiong

I submitted the manuscript last month and have received feedback from one reviewer so far.
2025-02-10 manuscript submitted
2024-02-16 under review
2024-03-14 4 reviewers, 1 completed.

(0) Thank | Bruce.xiong

Has the status of the poster been updated? I also submitted on 3.2, the date was updated to 3.7, still with editor.

(0) Thank | Aasa

May I ask what the outcome was later? I have been waiting for feedback from the editor for almost two weeks.

(0) Thank | 投中耶耶

The process was smooth and efficient, the editor was very responsible, the reviewers were very careful. Thanks to the editor, thanks to the reviewers, thanks to the teacher, thanks to the parents, and thanks to myself.

2024-07-23 manuscript submitted
2024-08-13 under review
2024-09-25 major revision
2024-11-02 manuscript submitted
2024-11-05 under review
2024-12-18 minor revision
2024-12-26 manuscript submitted
2025-01-20 under review
2025-02-27 accepted

(0) Thank | XIAOWO-SAR

20250210:sub
20250210:with editor
20250215:with editor

(0) Thank | join us

The review speed is quite good.

(0) Thank | 安静到无声

May I ask if the confirmation email sent by the journal to the author after submission must be confirmed by the first author and corresponding author?

(0) Thank | gyliu

The journal you submitted to has not been indexed by SCI yet, so it does not count as an SCI publication.

(0) Thank | GIS一颗星

Recently, it has been very slow. It has been over 20 days with the editor.

(0) Thank | 54868106nnu

Hello, it seems that the LaTeX template downloaded from the official website is not correct. Can you please provide the ISPRS LaTeX template? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | .

Hello, may I ask if you can provide the template of ISPRS to 2397275619 at qq.com? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | sc

The editing process was very fast, the reviewers were very professional and responsible, overall it went quite smoothly. Thank you to the teachers, editors, and reviewers!
2024.04.03 submitted to journal
2024.04.05 with editor
2024.04.28 decision in process
2024.04.28 major revision (two reviewers)
2024.06.10 submitted/ with editor
2024.06.11 under review
2024.07.08 decision in process
2024.07.10 major revision (one acceptance, one major revision with new experiments)
2024.08.21 submitted/ with editor
2024.08.27 under review
2024.09.05 decision in process
2024.09.05 accept, the end.

(1) Thank | 一个跻身科研大浪的小白

Why can't I register for this journal now? The customer service replied that the server crashed. Can you explain what happened?

(0) Thank | paper_king

What is the reason for the current registration issue with this journal?

(0) Thank | paper_king