The opinions given by the four reviewers are all very good, and after the article was revised, it was accepted for publication. The school can also reimburse for submissions to MDPI journals abroad, and the reputation is also good. Bioengineering-Basel is the official journal of Bioengineering website, and I think the overall quality is very high. If you want to increase your exposure, open-access journals with high readership and citation rates will help you.

(0) Thank | Billy99

Thank you for the answer above.

(0) Thank | vivi1

Similarly, now it is SCIE with an impact factor of 3.8, which can be found on the Web of Science.

(0) Thank | 猪猪读博士

Hello, is this journal the same as Bioengineering?

(0) Thank | vivi1

One word: Fast, MDPI is awesome!

(0) Thank | 猪猪读博士

Excuse me, is it the same publication as Bioengineering?

(0) Thank | vivi1

Excuse me, is this journal the same as Bioengineering? This relates to whether it can be retrieved in the future.

(0) Thank | vivi1

Is Bioengineering-Basel the same journal as Bioengineering?

(0) Thank | yshz

Submitted in June
Two major revisions in August, one reviewer didn't understand and asked many irrelevant questions
Accepted on August 29
Online on September 1

(0) Thank | 高桥晋吾

What is the difference between this journal and Bioengineering? When you click on Bioengineering, it also leads to the same homepage.

(0) Thank | xiaolin

How long does it usually take to be indexed by SCI?

(0) Thank | 木易66

When I submitted my paper, I did not choose a special issue. However, an editor emailed me recommending to transfer to a special issue that fits the theme better, and I agreed. The special issue expands the scope of the journal, but does not affect the review efficiency or publication and indexing after acceptance

(0) Thank | shhfu9jdh

Submitted on 3/4, but must select a special issue during the submission process, can't submit to his core journal

(0) Thank | 西城

Does this journal have to be assigned to his special issue?

(0) Thank | 西城

I thought that there would be minor revisions after the first review, but the reviewers provided a lot of suggestions, some of which were difficult to address. It was not until after major revisions that the paper was finally accepted.
The current cost-effectiveness seems acceptable (if the research group covers the publication fee), but I have the feeling that MDPI is becoming stricter this year. It is important to have a strong narrative, as submitting a paper that seems too superficial might lead to rejection based on the template alone

(1) Thank | shhfu9jdh

2023-07-03 Submitted
2023-07-04 under review
2023-08-01 major revision (two reviewers)
2023-08-05 Revision R1
2023-08-06 under review
2023-08-07 Accept (reviewers are satisfied)
2023-08-08 Proofreading
2023-08-10 Online 
Journal suitable for interdisciplinary work in medical engineering, fast review, high efficiency, OA journal

(0) Thank | shhfu9jdh

Journal editors are very responsible and respond quickly to any issues raised. They find professional reviewers who provide insightful feedback, and after making revisions based on their comments, the quality of the manuscript significantly improves. If the quality of the manuscript is poor, it will be rejected

(1) Thank | Laban