A good journal in the field of climate and climate change; three reviewers in the first instance, unanimously said that there is potential for publication, but also gave a lot of opinions. The review speed is fast, and the online speed is OK, but the official publication is very slow.

(8) Thank | Anonymous

Can I have an update? How long does it usually take for the first round of review? What do "Under review" and "Under Review" mean respectively? Can we track the review process for this journal?

(0) Thank | Accept**

How many days does it usually take to assign an editor or reject a submission?

(0) Thank | 小紫zzz

Try to avoid it as much as possible! It has been three months since the submission, and I don't know how many emails I have sent in between. The AE never replies, and I can't contact anyone to withdraw the submission. Haha~

(0) Thank | 小妮子-STAR

2022-11-22 Post

(1) Thank | 小妮子-STAR

Under review, in lowercase, should be external review, while in uppercase, "Under Review" refers to internal editorial review. It seems that this system does not allow us to view the reviewers' comments during the review process. Once all reviews are completed, the Associate Editor (AE) will send an email to you with the reviewers' comments, or you can check the review comments on the system.

(0) Thank | 柯岩瞬力

Hello, I have also submitted to this journal. After being assigned to an Associate Editor (AE), it has been in the "under review" status for over a month. I heard from my classmates that this journal allows authors to view the review process of the reviewers, but I couldn't find it in the review system. Could you please clarify if the manuscript is still with the AE or has it been sent for external review? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | rdeng97

The comments from the reviewer are all about grammar errors, not about the content of the article. Thank you.

(0) Thank | purplepie

How can others understand if there are grammar errors? Don't assume that all Chinese people can understand your Chinglish just because they are reviewing it.

(0) Thank | lion125

First review took two months with four reviewers who unanimously agreed that the paper has publication potential. Reviewer 1 accepted it directly, Reviewers 2 and 3 suggested minor revisions, and Reviewer 4 suggested major revisions regarding paper writing and organization. The editor also suggested major revisions. The reviewers were highly professional and provided a total of 84 comments, ranging from paragraph adjustments to errors in using certain indicators for comparison. Careful modifications were made over two months, and responses were written with over 12,000 words. The second review took 10 days, and the reviewer was quite satisfied with the detailed response and modifications, recommending publication with the need for reference adjustments. The revised version was sent back after one day, and acceptance was received a week later. Reviewer 4 seemed to be a prominent figure in the field, carefully reading the entire paper and providing valuable suggestions to eliminate redundancy and improve logical coherence, greatly enhancing the paper's quality.

(19) Thank | 柯岩瞬力

After major revisions, Reviewer 1 rejected the manuscript. The editor suggested resubmission, and after resubmission, a new reviewer was added. Reviewer 1 still rejected the manuscript, but it was accepted after major revisions. Typically, it takes about three months to receive feedback for two submissions. Thank you to the editor and the three reviewers, and I wish everyone success in their research.

(2) Thank | 易烊千玺

Waited for three months before the first review. Then Reviewer 1 said it was good and suggested publication.
Reviewer 2 strongly recommended rejection, stating that the article was incomprehensible and full of mistakes. However, all of Reviewer 2's comments were grammatical errors? The quality of this reviewer is truly speechless.

(17) Thank | purplepie

is quite good, the reviewer has a good opinion, and the paper has been improved after the reviewer's comments.

(0) Thank | 11

The influence factor is false high, and the overall level is worse than the Journal of climate, JGR.Chinese people are seriously irrigated!

(14) Thank | cm

11 months of review period, the process is quite rough, one of the reviewers is not allowed to change data, change the title, and finally compromise and recommend receiving.

(0) Thank | gg

Irrigation of a water 啥 properly

(14) Thank | Anonymous

The article was originally sent to JGR-A and was retired. After a slight modification, I selectd for IJOC, submitted in mid-December, returned comments in mid-February, and revised in mid-March.After returning, I received it in mid-April.The two reviewers, as long as they are properly revised according to the reviewers' opinions, have a high probability of being acceptd.

(3) Thank | Dvd6

climate is second only to several top journals such as JC CD.A very good journal in the second district, can not say the top, but also close to the top

(1) Thank | cd

2月4The daily submission was rejected by the editor on February 8. Although it was a tragedy, I feel that this journal is really good and the editing speed is faster.The overall feeling is that the journal language requirements are higher, and the insects who feel that the language is not good are still looking for someone to change the language.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I submitted in July 2010In November, the minor repair opinion was sent back in January, and the draft was recorded in February. The speed is OK. If the submission is successful, it can be done in half a year.

(0) Thank | Anonymous