Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | INT J APPL EARTH OBS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0303-2434 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1872-826X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 3.90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-applied-earth-observation-and-geoinformation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://ees.elsevier.com/jag/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Geoscience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 422 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0303-2434%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Sort of slow, 4-8 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation: | Write a review |
Author: 农业遥感 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-07-01 17:54:39 Junk journal, very slow, one year of review, minor revision after major revision, the reviewer agreed to publish, the editor-in-chief said it’s not in line with the direction. Waste a year. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 南海Ocean Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-04-07 11:44:41 Submission on June 17, 2019; July 28, major revision; August 11, revised submission; August 22, sent for review; September 25, minor revision; October 3, acceptance. It was published online around October 14. It was very fast and the efficiency was very high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: akang Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-26 23:54:27 I wrote the article about geothermal detection by thermal infrared remote sensing. The review was relatively fast, and the questions were professional. I submitted it on January 10, 2019. It was under review on January 11, 2019; major revision was required on January 27, 2019. (One reviewer had a good opinion, approved of the methods, and gave some professional advices. The other two mainly gave four comments in research, some suggestions on grammar and increasing field verification.) I submitted the revision on March 23, 2019. (It was Chinese New Year, so I revised it slowly. And after all the problems were revised, it took three or four days for the professional proofreading.) I was informed of acceptance on March 26, 2019. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-11 13:52:00 2 month review, 2 reviewers, and high comment quality. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 咸菜36 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-01 10:16:06 Follow-up 2025.02.10 Decision in Process 2025.02.14 Decision in Process 2025.02.16 Major Revision 2025.03.04 Revised With Editor 2025.03.07 With Editor 2025.03.12 Under Review (3-1-0) 2025.03.13 Under Review (3-2-0) 2025.03.17 Decision in Process (3-2-2) 2025.03.20 Minor Revision Returned With Editor on the same day 2025.03.21 Major Revision (Editor added a round of major revisions, mainly modifying some charts) 2025.03.26 Revised With Editor Waiting... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 季风调色盘 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 16:09:35 OP, your RRC to DIP process is so fast! It's been 20 days for me and there hasn't been any progress. I've sent emails before but the status hasn't changed and the date hasn't been updated either. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 季风调色盘 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 16:07:45 Has the status of your RRC changed now? How long have you been waiting roughly? My RRC has been unresponsive for 20 days now. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ecnulc Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-28 15:03:29 One of the reviewers for my second review has disappeared, causing a delay in the process. After changing the deadline once, I am now inviting a new reviewer. Will this slow down the process significantly? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 张三悬 Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-25 09:59:14 Investment was quick before 2023, and in the past two years, there are more Chinese investors. The requirements for format are very strict, and you must provide two layers of skin before investing. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 少管我 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-13 19:43:41 Submitted to the journal on 2025.02.27 Rejected on 2025.02.29 For the speed of rejection alone, they deserve full marks! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Ruci Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-05 10:19:47 Is there still no news? I have been back for a month and still haven't heard anything. ![]() ![]() |
Author: beijixiong1 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-02 10:51:30 What happened to the brothers afterwards? ![]() ![]() |
Author: beijixiong1 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-24 15:10:21 It has been over ten days since the submission was under review and no one has accepted the manuscript yet. What should I do? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 墨眉 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-24 11:27:08 I am in the process of revisions. The second round of review comments will come back on February 10, 2025, and then I will enter the RRC status. It has been 14 days now, and I still haven't reached "with editor". Brother, how are you doing now? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 咸菜36 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-14 11:55:53 No, I didn't submit it directly without making any special formatting changes. ![]() ![]() |
Author: god Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-14 11:46:11 OP, I would like to inquire if there is a specific format template for submitting articles and papers to this journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 咸菜36 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-10 11:44:02 2024.12.27 With Editor The middle date has changed a few times, always With Editor 2025.01.08 Under Review (11-0-0) 2025.01.09 Under Review (11-1-0) 2025.01.11 Under Review (11-4-0) 2025.01.17 Under Review (11-4-1) 2025.01.21 Required Reviews Completed (11-4-2) 2025.01.24 Required Reviews Completed (11-4-3) It has been 20 days since RRC, not sure how long until the results are given... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 郑子铭 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-08 23:56:58 Boss, what is your plagiarism rate? ![]() ![]() |
Author: abelz Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-25 19:22:48 The reviewer's review speed is very efficient and fast. It usually takes about 4 months to be in the hands of the editor, but if the editor is quick, it can be finished in 3 months. Overall, the speed is very fast. Best wishes. Below is the submission experience: 10.1 we 10.16 we (change editor) 10.18 ur 11.4 rrc 11.18 dip received major in the evening 12.4 revised we 12.20 ur 12.27 rrc 1.3 dip 1.5 minor revised we on the same day 1.18 ur, rrc on the same day 1.25 dip 1.25 accepted that evening ![]() ![]() |
Author: 木子田心 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-19 19:02:33 The submission was made on August 10, 2024, and it is now December 19, 2024, but it is still in the out for review stage. What is going on? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Yzb Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-14 12:28:25 On December 6th, the official website usually sends out the review or rejection results within about two days. However, as of the 14th, there is still no news. The process seems slow, but this is excessively slow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 阿鲁巴巴 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-07 18:08:48 It has been 2 months and no reviewers have accepted. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 龙文江 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-24 20:35:15 I would like to ask everyone, is this journal a bit biased in its selection process? I submitted twice, the first time they recommended a journal called Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, I submitted my first article to this journal, and I thought it was fine. But I don't know if this journal thought I was an easy target the second time, I submitted my second article with big names and even funding from the National Natural Science Foundation, but they still rejected me and asked me to submit an article on surveying to a new journal. Am I an easy target? The main reason I am posting this message now is because my article has now been accepted by RSE. I feel like some of the editors of this journal are a bit biased, don't you think? ![]() ![]() |
Author: ssaege Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-06 09:27:57 The overall speed is quite fast (8~18 weeks), the review comments are very professional, and the impact factor has been steadily increasing in recent years. Everyone can try submitting. Here is the timeline for two articles submitted this year: Article 1: 01.28 Submission 01.31 Rejection with encouragement to resubmit (article was too long) 02.18 Resubmission (reduced to 8000 words) 02.19 With editor 02.20 Under review 03.09 Revise and resubmit decision 03.11 Major revision 03.26 Resubmission for revisions with editor 03.28 Under review 04.03 Revise and resubmit decision 04.04 Major revision 04.14 Resubmission for revisions with editor 04.14 Under review 04.15 Revise and resubmit decision 04.18 Accept Article 2: 07.16 Submission 07.17 With editor 08.24 Under review 09.13 Revise and resubmit decision 09.29 Minor revision 10.05 Resubmission for revisions with editor 10.15 Under review 10.19 Revise and resubmit decision 10.22 Minor revision 10.24 Resubmission for revisions with editor 11.06 Accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: 000100 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-01 09:27:04 How long has it been since you submitted it for review? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |