The first review lasted one month, two reviewers recommended minor revisions and no additional experiments was required. I feel pretty good. But it has been 20 days since revised submission, it’s still Under Review, the time of status have not changed. Is anyone in the same situation? The brothers who also submitted manuscripts said that they processed the revised manuscript fast!

(8) Thank | 一投就有

I saw that an undergraduate from a certain college published nearly 10 articles in this journal, which is really amazing. ------------------As far as I know, most papers that International Immunopharmacology used to publish were research papers. As a classic time-honored journal in the field of immunopharmacology, although the IF is not so high, the reputation has always been good. In recent years, with the development of bioinformatics, editors occasionally received such pure bioinformatics articles that he found quite interesting and published them. There were eight or nine associate editors. Every time this buddy submitted a manuscript with a different last author, no one noticed that they were all this buddy's masterpiece. This time this guy injured the journal and blocked the way of many others. It is said that the journal is taking this matter seriously.

(12) Thank | SIMMImmunology

After submitting the manuscript, a major revision was required one month after the first review, and three months were given. I finished it in half a month, but did not make up most of the experiments required, because there were no conditions in the laboratory. Explanations were given for those parts, and it was accepted directly after half a month after the overhaul. The reviewer looked carefully and asked a lot of questions. As long as each problem is solved and a reasonable explanation is given if it cannot be solved, the reviewer will not embarrass you too much.

(1) Thank | Zhimiao Zou

Personally think that the journal has relatively easy acceptance.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

After submitting my paper, I was rejected with comments, feeling frustrated. The main issue was with the writing of the paper. I wanted to ask if I need to change the title of the paper before resubmitting it? Is the problem of duplicate paper titles preventing submission?

(0) Thank | 北方大虾

After I went back for rework, my speed was not as fast as the first review. Have you got any results?

(0) Thank | 我懒

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "Shabi Chinese Academy of Sciences."

(0) Thank | 小卖铺老板

Region 2, subregions 2 and 3, not top.

(0) Thank | 小卖铺老板

Does anyone know what the latest partition is?

(0) Thank | 爱学医的墩墩

Could you please tell me if you send emails directly to the editor for inquiries? My submission has not been updated for over 40 days, and it seems like the responses to emails are automated. Is there a way to directly contact a specific editor to follow up on my submission?

(0) Thank | wmomo

Both the editor and the reviewers are very serious, and their suggestions are particularly insightful and helpful. The overall content of the article is quite rich. After receiving the first round of suggestions, I consulted a large amount of literature, supplemented and improved the content of the article, ensuring logical coherence. The revised version was accepted.

(0) Thank | 璐瑶y

This magazine invited me to review the manuscript, so I checked the score and evaluation.

(0) Thank | 温和的常常

Less than 30 days after submitting the manuscript, we received comments for revision. Two reviewers provided detailed feedback, each raising about 10 questions for major revisions. We spent around 30 days thoroughly reviewing the literature and responding to each question, without conducting additional experiments. Approximately one week after submitting our responses, the manuscript was accepted. The efficiency was very high.

(0) Thank | 逆流的鱼

Nov 30, 2024, Submitted to journal
Dec 30, 2024, Major revision
Feb 11, 2025, Minor revision
Feb 12, 2025, Accept

(0) Thank | ronleexxxxxxx

How many reviewers' opinions do you need?

(0) Thank | 我懒

How is yours? Did the reviewer accept it?

(0) Thank | lucky boy-5

Just rejected in less than a minute after submission, that's impressive.

(0) Thank | zdj2003

Did you invite new reviewers later? My first revision also returned after 1 week, the original two reviewers did not accept, the editor invited a new reviewer yesterday, I am anxious.

(0) Thank | WLL~

Did you receive it? Do we need to wait for all reviewers to finish reviewing? Mine also invited over 60 reviewers at once.

(0) Thank | 嘟嘟是只小泰迪

I want to ask everyone if the pharmacological mechanism of inflammation can be submitted to this journal.

(0) Thank | 11

I still can't find the reviewer, what should I do?

(0) Thank | wmomo

Apr 30, submitted, 2 days for review, rejected by editor after 2 weeks of no reviewer found. Then submitted to BP (fortunately rejected in the end, otherwise would have been at a loss on hold).
May 30, reconsidered and submitted to the same journal, without making any changes to the content. This time it was a Chinese editor, thankful for always helping me find reviewers.
Oct 5, Major revision, requested to add a little experiment.
Oct 19, revised.
Nov 6, assigned editor, accepted in 5 minutes.

(0) Thank | drzhangzz

Three weeks were supposed to be for major repairs, but the issues were all minor, so it was fixed in one week.

(0) Thank | drzhangzz

Submission on October 24, 2024
Major revision on November 13, 2024
Acceptance on November 27, 2024
Time flies.

(0) Thank | 爱学医的墩墩

How much time was given for the modification?

(0) Thank | lucky boy-5