The top endodontology journal has high requirements for novelty of article. The editor is responsible. In 2019, IF is 3.801, passing 4 soon.

(0) Thank | cyprien

It took more than three months to come back after the repair. ???

(0) Thank | 向秋小娘子

It's faster now, the new issues are released as quickly as possible

(0) Thank | 是志丹吖

How long does it take for the editor to give feedback?

(0) Thank | 风见春雷

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Sharing experience: For submitting to Zone 1, they really emphasize the innovation of the topic and the logic of the article. The editors and reviewers are very responsible and good at raising questions, which are objective and critical! The first review took a bit long, but the process sped up afterwards. I just did the third revision today, so it should be accepted in the next few days

(0) Thank | 向秋小娘子

Each magazine has its own requirements for the number of keywords, please refer to the submission guidelines of the magazine. According to the statistical analysis of relevant publications, most articles use around 4 keywords

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Graphical Abstract can be translated as "图文摘要". The role of the Graphical Abstract is similar to the abstract of a paper, but it does not need to be as detailed. Instead, it is more about highlighting the highlights or attractive points in the article, attracting readers and helping them understand the full text at a glance, with a certain promotional effect

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a Graphical Abstract?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

Do magazine companies have requirements on the number of keywords?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Approximately 20% acceptance rate, with a high requirement for novelty in articles. Optimistic about IF reaching 4 next year for the field of endodontics

(0) Thank | 岭南绮亦

It is normal, the review process for this impurity is rather slow. Hal, published on 2018-01-17: SCI(2016): 3.015 SCI(2015): 2.842 SCI(2014): 2.971 It has been three months since submission and it is still under review. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | 北风冷南

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The magazine has a score of 3 for quality, but the articles vary in quality. Some articles have a terrible amount of work, and the review process is tedious and lengthy. Do not submit if you are in a hurry

(0) Thank | 四风溥心

Is there a layout fee for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 黄土笑曼

Review is fast, but it took four months to reject the manuscript due to high requirements for innovation

(0) Thank | Parker Smith

Is it normal to still be under review after three months of submission?

(0) Thank | Parker Smith

It's a normal process, this journal has always had high requirements

(0) Thank | 西风皓宇

3 points on edge, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase would be good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Terrible magazine, submitted on 20170522, rejected and asked to resubmit four days later. They pointed out some formatting issues, which I fixed on the same day and resubmitted. Today I received a rejection notice, stating "comparatively low level of interest for the readership." Why didn't they mention that it didn't fit the specific interests of the journal's readers earlier? It wasted half a month. I will never submit to this magazine again

(0) Thank | 白骨怜双

How is this magazine? Is it worth investing in? Seeking experiences, thank you!

(0) Thank | 月河瑞芳

A very bad magazine

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

A very bad magazine

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁