Out of scope. Submitted in the morning, rejected in the afternoon. The editing efficiency is indeed very high.

(5) Thank | 七七七

Have always liked this journal very much. I feel that this journal attaches great importance to technology. Students who are doing food technology are encouraged to consider it.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Thank you very much to editor Mary Ann Augustin for her diligent and responsible work, and for being very efficient. Love it!

(0) Thank | takeee

I have been waiting for 10 days after submitting my paper on low-temperature plasma, and it has been in "with editor" status the whole time. I'm not sure if I should follow up or not. I'm afraid that following up might lead to a direct rejection. Has anyone experienced being in "with editor" status for such a long time?

(0) Thank | guahan

After hearing you complain like that, I feel like I'm done for. I also just submitted an article that hasn't been processed in 5 days, still "with editor". Could it be the same editor again? Why can't this journal allow us to choose editors? Some journals allow authors to avoid certain editors and reviewers based on their preferences.

(0) Thank | guahan

Are you all involved in non-thermal processing? This Dallas company seems to be doing non-thermal processing

(0) Thank | guahan

Has anyone submitted to this journal recently?

(0) Thank | llbbbl

I got rejected too, sigh, is this journal's requirements too strict?

(0) Thank | theshy人品好

The editor rejected it without sending it for review, and it feels increasingly difficult

(0) Thank | 姜大龙

I am also this editor. After the first review, there was no response from the editor for two weeks. After sending a reminder letter, I received a revision on the third day. It has been five days since the revision, and I am wondering if I can remind them again. Sigh, I am in a hurry.

(0) Thank | Zerv

Although the article has been accepted, this submission was the most frustrating one.
2022/07/27 Submission
2022/07/30 Under review
2022/09/07 Major revision by two reviewers
2022/09/23 Under review again, and the nightmare began. The reviewers finished their review in a week, but the editor went missing. After one month, we had to remind them.
2022/11/04 Minor revision (one word error) Manuscript returned on the same day, but the editor went missing again. So we had to remind them on 2022/11/22. Unexpectedly,
2022/11/24 Major revision The editor unexpectedly reviewed the manuscript again.
2022/11/28 We submitted the revised manuscript and it remained with the editor. We had to remind them on 2022/12/10, and surprisingly,
2022/12/13 Minor revision The editor thought one of the highlights was not significant and requested its removal!!!
In the final submission, it remained with the editor again, and this time we had to remind them after a week.
2022/12/23 Accepted
The editor is Dallas G. Hoover!!! If we didn't remind, nothing would have been done! A very unpleasant submission experience!

(2) Thank | tttttyyyyy

2022.09.13 submit - Submitted on September 13, 2022.
2022.09.16 Under Review - Undergoing review as of September 16, 2022.
2022.11.03 minor revision for acceptance - Minor revisions required for acceptance on November 3, 2022.
2022.11.08 accept - Accepted on November 8, 2022.

(1) Thank | ZPeng

I didn't expect to encounter fellow classmates who have had similar experiences in this comment.

(0) Thank | 科研小小废柴

May I ask about the current status of my submission? I submitted it in November 2021 and it was reviewed within a week. It is now almost May 2022 and it is still undergoing external review.

(0) Thank | 粒粒橙

Is it easy to understand the article I just submitted yesterday about membranes?

(0) Thank | 呦呵

Are you also doing Ohm heating?

(0) Thank | ddxt

Submitted in mid-April, revised on May 21st, resubmitted in mid-June, and accepted in August. Published in December.

(0) Thank | 光通电不加热

Submitted in mid-May, it took four months and went through major revisions - major revisions - minor revisions. I was very fortunate, and I wish you all the best.

(0) Thank | 曦望之光

The supervisor has not submitted any papers to SCI since joining. The student will translate it themselves, and the institution will proofread it. Submission will be made on May 15th, and minor revisions will be made in mid-June (one reviewer has no comments, while another has four minor comments that can be addressed). The revised version will be submitted on July 4th, and it will be accepted on July 5th.

(5) Thank | ddxt

Same as 2 months

(0) Thank | Andy

2016.4.7 submit (under review within a week)2016.6.3 minor revision for acceptance2016.6.14 minor revision for acceptance2016. 6.14 Accept

(11) Thank | Clause

2016.4.7 submit (under view in a week)2016.6.3 minor revision for acceptance2016.6.14 minor revision for acceptance2016. 6.14 Accept

(1) Thank | Clause

2015.12.4 submit2016.1.3 wait editor evaluation2016.1.8 minor revision2016.1.12 submit R12016. 1.14 Accept

(0) Thank | Jsea

This journal is still relatively easy to accept. After submitting the manuscript, it will be submitted for review in one week. Under review, after one month, overhaul, repair and review, then minor repair,Accepted after 3 days of repair!Impact factor 3 or above, can not be a district journal!Need to try the article, the efficiency is still quite high!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous