IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (TMI) and Medical Image Analysis (MIA) are currently the top 2 journals in medical imaging. TMI's quality control has become higher and higher in recent two years, and the number of manuscripts accepted is about half of TIP. The review speed is faster than TIP, but the rejection rate is higher than TIP. Especially in the past two years, most of the articles in TIP are from several large groups in China.

(24) Thank | Machine Learning

Respond to the 16th floor. TMI’s acceptance rate is not high, but in fact it’s not that low. Because there is no option for “major revision” provided in TMI, only a “reject and resubmit”, so the manuscript with major revision will also be assigned a new number.

(1) Thank | doitlikenever

It was over praised! Quite a few of the articles have no basic logic, but they can still be published! It is without much innovation to apply general algorithms on medical images! The impact factor is even higher than TIP. I can’t understand!

(109) Thank | 一只小皮蛋

Top publication for image processing. Focus on biomedical imaging.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

May I ask how the follow-up results are? How long has it been from AE Assigns Reviewers to Awaiting EIC Decision? It has been three months since AE Assign Reviewers, and I am still in this status.

(0) Thank | 养乐多超鱼

Please wait for the scores from the reviewers on April 6, 2025.

(0) Thank | kkk222iu

2025.3.24 Accept pending minor revision
2025.3.28 A revision has been submitted

(0) Thank | kkk222iu

If there is data involving both humans and animals within a hospital, approval from the corresponding department's ethics review committee is required.

(0) Thank | Sanm

Is there anything specific that needs to be paid attention to? If using private data from the hospital, an ethical approval is required.

(0) Thank | 筝筝日上

2024.11.19 Resubmit
2024.10.25 Wait for reviewers' scores
2025.1.19 AE to recommend
2025.2.01 Awaiting EIC Decision
2025.2.07 Accept pending minor revision
2025.2.09 Revision has been submitted
2025.2.11 Wait for reviewers' scores
2025.3.04 Awaiting EIC Decision
2025.3.05 Accepted

(0) Thank | hijack_sanm

I referred to the experiences of many predecessors before, and today my paper has been accepted. I have specially provided a relatively complete submission experience for everyone to refer to, hoping that everyone's work will have a good result.

2024.5.14 Submitted
2024.5.21 AE assigns reviewers
2024.6.22 Under Review
2024.7.29 Wait for Reviewers' Scores
2024.9.22 AE to Recommend
2024.10.15 Reject/Resubmit: major revisions needed and new external review required

(0) Thank | hijack_sanm

I feel a bit nervous about having five reviewers.

(0) Thank | 凌恒

A major revision took four months, with five reviewers spending nearly eighty days on it. Is this considered good or bad?

(0) Thank | 凌恒

February 19, 2025. Wait for Reviewers' Scores.

(0) Thank | kkk222iu

2025.2.5 resubmit: Awaiting Administrator Processing.

(0) Thank | kkk222iu

Is there any result?

(0) Thank | 来日可期

After he is under review, he will enter the review process.

(0) Thank | FPX

07.10 submitted
07.11 awaiting administrator processing
07.15 awaiting AE 
07.15 AE assigns reviewers
07.21 waiting reviewers scores
09.10 reject/resubmit: major revisions needed and new external review required
11.06 resubmit
11.08 AE assigns reviewers
11.15 waiting reviewers scores
12.07 minor;
12.19 resubmit.
12.20 accepted.

(0) Thank | BINGO_XDU

24.11.14 submitted
24.11.15 awaiting administrator processing
24.11.18 awaiting AE assignment
24.11.28 AE Assigns Reviewers

(0) Thank | C& AGWAII

Submission Process Record:
24.10.23 Submitted
24.10.24 Awaiting Administrator Processing
24.10.25 Editor Assigns AE
24.10.25 Awaiting AE Assignment
24.11.08 AE Assigns Reviewers
24.11.09 Under Review
24.11.28 Wait for Reviewer Scores

(0) Thank | walter24

The review process took a little over a month, and it has been almost two weeks since the AE was supposed to recommend.

(0) Thank | gyguo95

2024.11.08 submitted
2024.11.17 Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment

(0) Thank | yajunliu

Yes, the first instance overall was relatively easy to respond to, and the second instance went more smoothly after the response.

(0) Thank | popo

You are so fast with the second review. The first review comments were quite good, and the second review is faster, right?

(0) Thank | BINGO_XDU

It has been one month since the second review of the AE to recommend. Can we follow up on this? Where should I send the email?

(0) Thank | Afireinthesky