I'm a doctor, and do computer vision related work. 2020.08.19, submitted; 2020.10.02, minor revision was required; 2020.10.11, submitted after revision; 2020.10.12, accepted. Since this work is revised work, the process of acceptance is relatively smooth. You can just make minor revisions according to the comments given. Feedback is fast.

(4) Thank | asdfasdfas

The manuscript was submitted at the end of August, and the review comments were returned in early-October. One reviewer accepted it after minor revision, and the other one rejected it. The main reason was to question innovation. Secondly, the reviewer said an important comparative experiment was not made. In fact, it was not labeled in detail. I felt that I didn't express it well, so I wrote rebuttal to associate editor. Associate editor said it couldn’t be changed, and encouraged to resubmit. It was resubmitted but the result was unknown. Letter puts too much emphasis on innovation. I don't know if the rewritten content can impress the reviewers, but it seems that it was assigned to the same associate editor.

(11) Thank | Jayden

Share your depressed mood. I received a rejection mail at 2 o'clock this morning after resubmission. I opened my eyes and saw the news in the morning., and I was very depressed. It was the same as the first submission: There were one minor revision and one rejection. I felt that the reviewer who rejected the article was the same one in the first submission. The reviewers to AE were changed. The reviewer who rejected the manuscript seemed to have a grudge against me, who always said my manuscript was lacking in innovation. When I resubmitted, I wrote a lot of points to prove the difference between my ideas and other methods. I also did simulations, but he didn't look at them, but insisted that it was not creative. As for the reason, it was the same as that of the first rejection. I can only say that the reviewers are really awesome!

(78) Thank | 悲催的攻城狮

Must be novel, practical, and impactful. About 2 months to first review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

RR was given two months. After reapplying, he was directly accepted after a month and a half. However, he was only accepted in March, and the new partition was moved from Zone 2 to Zone 3. What a bolt from the blue.

(0) Thank | 孤独的feng

I don't know why I was assigned to computer science.

(0) Thank | Aeternum

Become three areas, just in the middle, surrender.

(0) Thank | Muzi

Out in five days.

(0) Thank | Muzi

How long did it take from "Awaiting AE Decision" to receiving the final result?

(0) Thank | 小爽子

2024.Aug.06: Submitted
2024.Aug.15: Assigned to a SAE
2024.Aug.19: Assigned to a AE, in peer review
2025.Jan.07: RRQ (4 Reviewers, 3 Publish In Minor, 1 Reject)
2025.Jan.17: Resubmitted
2025.Mar.01: Awaiting AE decision
2025.Mar.07: in peer review（I don't know why）
2025.Mar.16: Accept (3 Reviewers, 2 Publish Unaltered, 1 Publish In Minor)

(0) Thank | Jonvi

Submit by March 14, 2025.

(0) Thank | xxyyhh

The first round had four reviewers, and the second round had three.

(0) Thank | sw1995

2025-3-12 AE assigned in peer review

(0) Thank | oukan

2025.02.19 Submitted

2025.02.22 AE: Not Assigned In Peer Review

2025.03.10 AE: Not Assigned Submitted

2025.03.12 AE: Assigned In Peer Review

(0) Thank | LuminousPkk

2025-3-2 Submission assigned to SAE
2025-3-4 AE not assigned during peer review
2025-3-10 AE not assigned upon submission

(0) Thank | oukan

How many reviewers are there for the 11.8 reject?

(0) Thank | LuminousPkk

The review process is very slow, but it was later found out that the reviewers actually have a review period of only three weeks. The delay may be due to the reviewers being over due.

(0) Thank | sw1995

2025-3-6
Three reviews-AQ Accept with Mandatory Revisions
Feeling like SPL requirements are a bit high.

(0) Thank | 简单的电脑

Is it being sent for external review? Why is the process taking so long?

(0) Thank | Li2025a

Submit on 2025.02.19.

(0) Thank | LuminousPkk

There's nothing much to say, I think the innovation is not working.

(0) Thank | Muzi

This journal feels very random in terms of review speed. It has been 44 days since submission, and the Associate Editor has not been assigned yet.

(0) Thank | Liupujiang

I am also worried about not being assigned an AE for a long time.

(0) Thank | Liupujiang

2025.02.15 提交
2025.02.17 高级区域编辑分配
2025.02.25 副编辑分配，同行评审

Translation:
2025.02.15 submitted
2025.02.17 senior area editor assignment
2025.02.25 associate editor assignment, In peer review

(0) Thank | zkshishuai

The journal is really slow. I submitted a paper and just half a month later it was assigned to an Associate Editor. The next day it was marked as "Awaiting AE Decision". It took them so long to reject my paper, which is a bit hard to accept.

(0) Thank | 小花花买菜