2020.07.06 Submitted; 2020.09.02 Major revision was required. Two reviewers enthusiastically put forward more than 60 opinions, and we almost did not finish the revision; 2020.09.27 Revision submitted; 2020.10.16 Minor revision was required. One reviewer suggested to accept it directly, and the other one put forward more than 30 opinions; 2020.10.21 Revision submitted; 2020.10.31 Accepted. It lasted for four months, and the two reviewers are extremely strict.

(8) Thank | Chenjm

2020.5.18, submission; 2020.7.16, major revision was required in the first review, and 28 days were given for revision. More than 30 comments were raised by the two reviewers; 2020.8.09, the first revised manuscript was successfully submitted; 2020.09.04, minor revision was required in the second review. The opinion was that the foreign language writing was not good enough, and it was required to be revised by foreign language speakers; 2020.09.16, the second revised manuscript was successfully submitted; 2020.09.21, the article was accepted successfully. In summary: 1. You should be serious for the first revision, and every comment should be answered carefully. I basically revised the whole article; 2. The foreign language writing must be good enough. One reviewer emphasized the foreign language writing was not good enough in the first review and second review! (I feel so depressed, I feel it’s not bad); 3. This journal now has an open access option, but the publication fee is $1,250; 3. It took more than 4 months from submission to acceptance. The overall process was smooth, the review speed was fast, and the comments raised by the reviewers were pertinent and professional. Thanks a lot! After the revision, the manuscript was upgraded to a higher level.

(3) Thank | xiaozuer

2019.12.1, submission; 2020.2.12, major revision. There were two reviewers, who raised many comments. I was required to submit the revised manuscript in 28 days. Due to the pandemic, the experimental code and data and the manuscript were in the laboratory, and the manuscript was not revised in time. After waiting for two weeks, I found that returning to school was hopeless. I started from the beginning and redid all the things, which was hard. I supplemented the experiments and the data according to the comments of the reviewers, and answered the related questions; 2020.5.1, resubmitted the revised manuscript; 2020.6.19, minor revision, one reviewer was changed. The original reviewer considered the revision was sufficient, and the newly added reviewer requested supplementing an experiment. 2020.6.23, the revised manuscript was submitted after supplementing the experiment. Hope to have good news.

(10) Thank | 天涯童鞋

Relatively good.

(16) Thank | happyday

Please return for major maintenance on March 31, 2025.

(0) Thank | 谅

It has been over 40 days since the major renovation.

(0) Thank | rswhj

2025.3.29 Minor Revision
There is a formatting issue, it should be centered.

(0) Thank | Macxld

Second review for five months, still no response. Reminder letter unanswered, please submit carefully.

(0) Thank | Macxld

However, RS is MDPI, I don't know how you say it over there. We now disdain MDPI here and have stopped participating in their award system. Teacher Shenbo also thinks it's a deduction.

(0) Thank | jiyujiyu

There's no way around it, after all, with TGRS in charge over there, at least it's still in Zone 2, which is pretty good.

(0) Thank | 倾心

Height growth is a bit slow.

(0) Thank | www

The top spot in the Chinese Academy of Sciences zone has been taken away, even less impressive than RS. How does everyone view this?

(0) Thank | homage

投资结果未知，日期为2025年3月17日。

(0) Thank | Shome

This journal is in this state, it may or may not be submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 倾心

What's the news now?

(0) Thank | wxybtq

I am also looking forward to being recommended for early admission.

(0) Thank | s1mpleo

How long will the rejection last?

(0) Thank | s1mpleo

The direction is not suitable, it is recommended to submit elsewhere. The submission number is already over 800.

(0) Thank | 0110

Submitted on November 20, 2024
Revised on December 21, 2024, with three very professional reviewers
Revised again on February 5, 2025
Accepted on February 28, 2025
I love it, what a speed! Even though the revision process was painful, it was indeed professional!

(1) Thank | teacherA

Major Revision (14-Feb-2025)
A revision was submitted on 25-Feb-2025.

(0) Thank | 倾心

2025.01.09 First submission
2025.01.11 Under external review
2025.03.05 Returned for major revisions feedback

(0) Thank | 谅

My focus is on pansharpening, and I haven't received any feedback from you yet, just like the time for reviewing.

(0) Thank | wcac

Mapeifeng26 has just taken office and should be in the handover period.

(0) Thank | Macxld

It seems like the editor has been changed.

(0) Thank | accept~chong

You misunderstood, this journal is currently in this one state, including submission to the editor and peer review.

(0) Thank | 倾心