2020.6.19 Initial submission, With editor; 2020.6.27 Under Review; 2020.7.25 Major revision; 2020.8.20 Revision submitted, With editor; 2020.8.21 Under Review; 2020.10.17 Minor Revision; 2020.10.26 With editor; 2020.11.3 Minor Revision; 2020.12.11 With editor; 2020.12.13 Accept; 2020.12.17 Proof; 2020.12.24 Online. The paper belongs to the soil microecology and ARGs related direction. It took half a year in total. A major revision and two minor revisions were made during this period. The processing efficiency of the editor and the reviewer are very high. The questions raised were very helpful to improve the quality of the article. It finally got accepted when I was about to graduate. Thanks to everyone who helped me!

(1) Thank | 木易yang

I submitted it on April 9. It was under review on April 11. 60 days was given for major review on May 18. Three reviewers made 11 pages of revision comments, which were helpful to the manuscript. There were all simple questions, and I replied the reviewers’ comments carefully. I submitted it to the system on July 16. Due to the reason of myself, the manuscript was not submitted to the system until the last day of the submission deadline. Major revision was required on July 19, the editor gave another 7 pages of review comments. I submitted it on July 26. Minor revision was required on July 29. I simply revised the format according to the requirements of the journal. It was accepted on August 2. The deputy editor Christoph Tebbe was very responsible, and the speed was also very fast. It is the first article in my life, which was accepted smoothly. I am very happy. Thanks for the editor and reviewers!

(4) Thank | 动物园大佬板

It was firstly submitted to Soil and Tillage. Inviting reviewers spent more than three months. After submitting for review, the reviewers suggested to accept after major revision, but the journal editor rejected directly. It took a total of five months to get rejected. The editor-in-chief of this journal, Christoph Tebbe, is very good, conscientious and responsible. And the editors work efficiently. After our major revisions, the editor replied within a few days saying that it didn't need to be sent to the reviewers again, and would consider accepting it after a minor revision. It took only around four months from submission to revisions. After submission to so many journals, I have to say, the efficiency of this journal is quite high. I hope that the journal will become better and better!!!

(1) Thank | 小笨羊

The editor is quite responsible. Novelty requirements are somewhat high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Received at Editorial Office 17 Aug 2021.
Article revised 7 Apr 2022.
Article accepted for publication 7 Apr 2022.

The first review took three months, which is considered slow for this journal. The editor was responsible and quite fast, which is commendable. There were two major revisions, but the second round of editing decided to make minor revisions instead. The article was accepted on the same day as the minor revisions were submitted.

(0) Thank | 90DD

2021.2.06 Submission submitted to journal
2021.2.08 With editor
2021.2.14 Under review
2021.3.07 Major revision
2021.4.28 Resubmitted with editor after revision
2021.5.05 Accepted

(3) Thank | JOJO

Received at Editorial Office19 Nov 2017Article revised3 Mar 2018Article accepted for publication8 Mar 2018The journal is very efficient!

(0) Thank | yyyy

Editor Kuzyakov is very efficient!The impact factor is expected to exceed 3!

(0) Thank | yc

Editor Kuzyakov is very efficient!The impact factor is expected to exceed 3!

(0) Thank | yc

Very efficient journal, the editor is very responsible, I hope more and moreThe better.The submission process is as follows, for your reference only:Received at Editorial Office3 Apr 2017Article revised21 Jun 2017Article accepted for publication26 Jun 2017

(2) Thank | Anonymous

I have sent an article before, the editor is very responsible, and I selectd for this journal again.However, this time, the manuscript was reviewed three times. The third time, a reviewer was added, and three people were accepted. After the reply, they were accepted very quickly, and they passed through 10 months.But it was published very quickly and received online for a total of 10 days.

(0) Thank | 745646877@qq.com

had previously published an article, the editor was very responsible, and then selectd for this journal.However, this time, the manuscript was reviewed three times. The third time, a reviewer was added, and three people were accepted. After the reply, they were accepted very quickly, and they passed through 10 months.But it was published very quickly and received online for a total of 10 days.

(1) Thank | 745646977@qq.com

Can you ask for a major repair?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

How is the impact factor gone???

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Very good journal, the editor is very responsible, but the review speed is general, in the middle of a

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is very efficient, and the editor is very responsible. Personally like this journal, IF should be improved.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Very good journal, focusing onThe soil microbial ecology and soil nutrient conversion, the editor is very responsible, in the middle of 2 articles

(0) Thank | Anonymous

although not difficult, but the requirements for the article format is still relatively high.It is a moderately difficult journal, and it is estimated that IF will rise further in the future.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have read the manuscript of this journal reviewed by others. I feel that the level of reviewers is average and I can’t raise any questions. From the perspective of impact factors, the improvement is still relatively fast.From the four districts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the third district.

(0) Thank | Anonymous