The first review lasted for about 3 months. There was only one reviewer's opinion in the first review. According to the comments, the experiment was revised and supplemented. The second review lasted about 1 month, and the second review returned with an additional review.

(0) Thank | Alina Queen

It's really slower than other journals, the submission status has been six days already ?.

(0) Thank | Kristy2024

Could you please let me know how many days it will take for the editor to process the transfer request?

(0) Thank | bb accept

I'm stuck too, any progress on what to do next?

(0) Thank | Kristy2024

It has been 6 days since submission, what's going on? Is it still under review?

(0) Thank | Huangdaijuan

I have been waiting for the second review for 8 days. Is it still under review or has the editor not processed it yet?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

It's been 8 days and I'm still in the dip, is it not reviewed or edited yet?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

9.14 submission, 9.16 three reviewers for external review (previously submitted, the editor said to revise according to the opinions of the previous three reviewers before resubmitting). One review was returned on the same day, another on 10.5, and one is still pending. Review completed on 10.6 but still pending. Is there a similar situation?

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

I have been 24 days.

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

Do you want to see the original data chart three times?

(0) Thank | 犬走寻白

How long have you been in the DIP program? Were you ultimately rejected?

(0) Thank | Humphrey Coleridge

Submitted on 10.05, it is still Submitted to Journal. Have there been any changes on your end?

(0) Thank | 曼丽小郎君

How long has it been since you became the editor? The submission deadline to the magazine is 10.05, and the status has not changed yet.

(0) Thank | 曼丽小郎君

Aren't there supposed to be three reviewers? The other two also did not review in the end.

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

May I ask if the three repeated results provided for WB are bands or aggregated statistics? Do all WB results mentioned in the text need to be provided?

(0) Thank | 平原云霞

Hello, may I ask how did your submission to European Pharmacology turn out? I also received major revisions from both the first and second reviewers, and after making the revisions, it was rejected. Feeling anxious.

(0) Thank | 山治喜欢你

Where can I find the WB sample of the magazine?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

Submitted a meta paper on 9.11, received "with editor" status on 9.15, and the status has not changed since then.

(0) Thank | 苍风志利

Is it under review now?

(0) Thank | Marlon Zacharias

Yes, a revised version based on the suggestions of the reviewers can be submitted for further consideration.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Do you have an editor for the submissions now?

(0) Thank | rrrccccc

The review speed of EJP is still very fast and friendly. The first round of review mentioned language and grammar issues, but after Letpub polished it, it was accepted on the first attempt. Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | 赖赖

Yes, I did too. The first reviewer raised some questions, and after being rejected, the reviewer suggested making revisions and resubmitting. I followed the reviewer's advice and resubmitted, and then received acceptance over a month later.

(0) Thank | 金山绮云

Please repeat three times.

(0) Thank | 九阳易绿

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasis research direction: Kidney; Pharmacology
Experience sharing: Submitted on May 17, editor requested submission of WB results three times on May 20, submitted the same day, sent for review after a week, first review ended on June 11 with many questions from two reviewers, first review revisions returned on July 15, second review started on July 17 and ended on July 26, one reviewer requested additional experiments or rejection, while another reviewer had no issues, second review with additional experiments returned on August 7, third review started on August 9 and ended on August 15, DIP on August 16, accepted on August 22, good luck to everyone!

(0) Thank | 九阳易绿