The first review lasted for about 3 months. There was only one reviewer's opinion in the first review. According to the comments, the experiment was revised and supplemented. The second review lasted about 1 month, and the second review returned with an additional review.

(0) Thank | Alina Queen

2.16 Submitted
2.20 With editor
3.3 Request for submission of original uncropped WB images and funding
3.6 Returned after submission
3.11 With editor
3.13 Under review
3.31 Decision in process
4.2 Rejected

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

2.16 Submitted
2.20 With editor
3.3 Request for submission of original, uncropped images and funding
3.6 Returned after submission
3.11 With editor
3.13 Under review
3.31 DIP

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

2.16 Submitted
2.20 With editor
3.3 Request for submission of original uncropped WB images and funding
3.6 Returned after submission
3.11 With editor
3.13 Under review

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

2.16 submitted
2.20 with editor
3.3 requested to submit original, unedited WB images and funding
3.6 returned after submission
3.11 with editor

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

2.16 submitted
2.20 with editor
3.3 requested to submit original, unedited photos and funding for wb
3.6 return after submitting supplements

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

2025.2.20 with editor

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

Submission date: February 16, 2025.

(0) Thank | MAOMAOMAO

It's really slower than other journals, the submission status has been six days already ?.

(0) Thank | Kristy2024

Could you please let me know how many days it will take for the editor to process the transfer request?

(0) Thank | bb accept

I'm stuck too, any progress on what to do next?

(0) Thank | Kristy2024

It has been 6 days since submission, what's going on? Is it still under review?

(0) Thank | Huangdaijuan

I have been waiting for the second review for 8 days. Is it still under review or has the editor not processed it yet?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

It's been 8 days and I'm still in the dip, is it not reviewed or edited yet?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

9.14 submission, 9.16 three reviewers for external review (previously submitted, the editor said to revise according to the opinions of the previous three reviewers before resubmitting). One review was returned on the same day, another on 10.5, and one is still pending. Review completed on 10.6 but still pending. Is there a similar situation?

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

I have been 24 days.

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

Do you want to see the original data chart three times?

(0) Thank | 犬走寻白

How long have you been in the DIP program? Were you ultimately rejected?

(0) Thank | Humphrey Coleridge

Submitted on 10.05, it is still Submitted to Journal. Have there been any changes on your end?

(0) Thank | 曼丽小郎君

How long has it been since you became the editor? The submission deadline to the magazine is 10.05, and the status has not changed yet.

(0) Thank | 曼丽小郎君

Aren't there supposed to be three reviewers? The other two also did not review in the end.

(0) Thank | Albert Abraham

May I ask if the three repeated results provided for WB are bands or aggregated statistics? Do all WB results mentioned in the text need to be provided?

(0) Thank | 平原云霞

Hello, may I ask how did your submission to European Pharmacology turn out? I also received major revisions from both the first and second reviewers, and after making the revisions, it was rejected. Feeling anxious.

(0) Thank | 山治喜欢你

Where can I find the WB sample of the magazine?

(0) Thank | Lusi@123

Submitted a meta paper on 9.11, received "with editor" status on 9.15, and the status has not changed since then.

(0) Thank | 苍风志利