It was submitted on April 7th and sent for review on the 12th. Minor revisions were required on May 26th. There were 4 questions. The revised manuscript was returned on 31st, and it was sent for review again on June 3rd. Then there was a long and endless wait... On July 10th, the review date changed. It is estimated that the editor found that the reviewer did nothing so he reminded the manuscript. It was accepted on July 25th. The mood is really like a roller coaster. I checked the ER articles, and there were many manuscripts which had been sent for review for more than one month after the minor revision, and I also saw that they were only accepted 4 months after the minor revised submission. It is really up to my fate to receive the results after the revised submission.

(9) Thank | 袖白雪

It was in the Nanomaterials Photocatalysis direction. 14 Feb, submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 18 Feb, under review; 21 Feb, under editor evaluation; 23 Feb, revision was required. There were 2 reviewers and 8 comments in total; 25 Feb, revision submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 27 Feb, under review; 02 Mar, accept. 03 Mar online available. Thanks a lot to editor Aijie Wang!

(56) Thank | Mango

Submitted on the last day of 2019, it was reviewed for about a month, letting us make a major revision, basically answering some questions of the meaning of the article, which are difficult to answer. But it's easy to revise the article. I modified it for a week and submitted it, and after another week, it was sent back and we continued to revise it because I misunderstood the reviewer’s comments. It was resubmitted the same day, and it took more than a week to be accepted on February 25. Overall it was very fast in less than two months. Don’t look at the reviews to know the journal’s speed. It mainly depends on the articles. If the editor is interested in your article and the quality is high, it will be fast. Now that the requirements have been changed, I don't know how useful SCI papers are. I graduated in January this year. This is my seventh SCI paper. I personally think it's okay. Students who are still in postgraduate, come on!

(35) Thank | 二班的男生

25/03/31 提交给期刊
25/03/31 与编辑联系
25/04/01 与编辑联系
Looking for a kind-hearted editor.

(0) Thank | 啦啦啦elf

The difficulty of submitting articles to ER is increasing (due to the large number of submissions), and the quality requirements for manuscripts are also getting higher. However, the efficiency of the editors is still acceptable, so it is worth a try if the quality of the article is good.

(0) Thank | 顶刊收割机之锦鲤附体ing

How is the follow-up going?

(0) Thank | feiruyunduan

Just one day after submitting my application and it's already in the decision process. Does that mean I'm out of luck?

(0) Thank | feiruyunduan

September 26 submitted to journal; 
September 27 with editor; 
September 28 under review; 
A total of four reviewers accepted the review one by one within a week; 
October 24 revise, Environmental research seems not to distinguish between major and minor revisions, all are unified as revise, but from the comments, it should be a major revision (four reviewers, a total of 30 revision comments); 
November 13 revision; 
November 30 accept; 
December 2 online; 
December 3 proof; 
December 4 submit proof; 
December 6 officially published.

(0) Thank | 南星0729

Overall, it's not bad from what I can see from this submission. The journal actually processed it quite quickly. The only issue I encountered was with one of the reviewers, who kept bringing up the same problem that I couldn't resolve. I didn't make any changes, but the kind-hearted editor still accepted it. Grateful for that.

(0) Thank | 全都accept！

Did the editor accept it directly, or did they invite new reviewers for a third round of review?

(0) Thank | 张慧

06.19 submitted to journal
06.20 with editor
06.21 with editor
07.07 under review
07.08 under review
07.16 required reviews completed
07.20 required reviews completed
07.23 major revision
08.19 re submitted to journal
08.20 with editor
09.04 under review
09.05 accept

(0) Thank | 多多益善~

The editor requested the upload of the first draft in the email, but I forgot to upload the initial submission.

(0) Thank | 小菜包~

I would like to ask if you have submitted the initial manuscript when submitting the revised draft.

(0) Thank | 小菜包~

Do I need to submit the initial manuscript when submitting a revised version to ER?

(0) Thank | 小菜包~

Hello. I would like to inquire about the Environmental Research submission system. There doesn't seem to be a place to fill in recommended reviewers. Did you fill it out when you submitted before? Also, there is no option for selecting the publication format for the paper. Did you encounter the same issue when you submitted? Please advise.

(0) Thank | Mr Black

Under review

(0) Thank | nobody123

10.23 Submission
10.24 Under Review
1.24 Received reviewers' comments, a total of two experts, one of whom did not have specific issues, only gave a suggestion, while the other expert gave 10 detailed suggestions. 1.30 Returned after revisions (in a hurry for the Chinese New Year...)
2.14 Accepted, but pointed out a new error in the added image (cannot be careless just because of rushing for the Chinese New Year)
Now waiting for the proof to be finalized and then changing the image should be okay.
Thanks to Michelle for editing, the overall efficiency is very high, just took a bit longer to find reviewers (or maybe I was just too impatient and thought it was slow).

(0) Thank | EasonWangEMF

Hello, senior, do you go directly to minor revision after with editor, without going through the under review process?

(0) Thank | Z-先森

Hello, senior, do you revise directly with the editor after, without going through the under review process?

(0) Thank | Z-先森

Submit 2024.11.1
Peer review 2024.12.6
Revise 2024.12.23
Return revision 2025.1.6
Accept 2025.2.6
It has been quite smooth, except that it was stuck in a "submit to journal" status when first submitted. After sending a reminder email, things started moving quickly.

(0) Thank | 椅子

Congratulations to the group leader, embrace good luck, and may you be able to revise and send out new year blessings.

(0) Thank | Z-先森

Is it highly likely that an application will be rejected after it says "Decision in Process"?

(0) Thank | yzldzy

2024-11-30 submitted to the journal;
2024-12-02 with editor
2024-01-14 minor revision with 2 reviewers' comments being quite constructive
2024-01-18 revision sent back;
2024-01-19 under review, originally with two reviewers;
2024-01-24 review complete;
2024-01-25 decision in process

(0) Thank | nobody123

The first round of revisions was reviewed by three reviewers, with two recommending acceptance after modifications and one suggesting not to publish. The second round of revisions was reviewed by two reviewers, with one still not recommending publication and the other accepting.

(0) Thank | 猫咪老师先生

If there is no UR, then WE will accept it.

(0) Thank | 发布了文章的张三