The external review was responsible, giving comments of revision in one sentence by one sentence. In addition, the questions raised were very professional. The article was submitted in August 2019. It took 7 months for the first review, and a lot of review comments were given (mainly because of the application of the long sentences). The revised manuscript was submitted in 2 weeks. One month after the submission of the revision according to the first review, the result of the second review was returned. The first expert pointed out some sentence problems. It was submitted on the same day after revision, and it was accepted in a week.

(37) Thank | 小健

Received 18 November 2019; Received in revised form 21 March 2020; Accepted 22 March 2020; online 2 April 2020. I modified twice in total. The first time four reviewers asked more than 190 questions in total and only 6 minor questions the second time. It took less than four and a half months from submission to publication. It was terrible for me to revise the manuscript, and it took 45 days to make changes. Thank the hard-working editors and reviewers. The first article in my life! Yay!

(29) Thank | sonny超级萌

Received 12 August 2019, Revised 18 November 2019, Accepted 9 December 2019, Available online 13 December 2019. The first manuscript was submitted in August and then comments were received at the end of October. The editor-in-chief was very dedicated and the invited reviewers were all very professional in the field. Since one of the three reviewers whom the editor found seemed not to be knowledgeable in my field very well, the editor who was in charge invited two more reviewers. Thus, there was a long-time delay. But the last unified opinions of the five reviewers were all minor revisions. It took three weeks to modify and submit it. Finally, after more than a month of waiting, it was directly accepted. Thank the editor in chief for being extremely dedicated to his work. He was really kind of editor that comments would be given only when he found suitable reviewers. The comments provided by the reviewers were very in-depth and instructive for my future work. Benefited a lot.

(4) Thank | liuyangheu

Fast responses. Email reminders at each stage. Innovation requirements are high. Be careful with language and formatting. Personally, I feel that Engineering Structures is a very good journal, especially the structural direction.

(2) Thank | pe_sh@sina.com

At least three

(0) Thank | CC仗剑走天涯

Its sister journal, THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, has been downgraded from Q1 to Q2 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It seems they were too aggressive in the early stages.

(0) Thank | 十一月南瓜

Please update, 3rd review on March 18th for RRC.

(0) Thank | 呵呵哒199

The submission was made on March 17th, and it is still in the "waiting for editor" status. How long did it take for you to submit for review? Is the editorial process usually this slow?

(0) Thank | Edward

Congratulations on the double victory.

(0) Thank | 李小洱海

Yes, formal.

(0) Thank | CC仗剑走天涯

Is it officially released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences?

(0) Thank | 李小洱海

ES major and minor categories are all in Zone 1, stable and reliable.

(1) Thank | CC仗剑走天涯

Will the two reviewers of this journal make the decision after completing the editing? Sixteen submissions were sent in two and a half months, but only two were accepted. The two reviewers have just finished reviewing them.

(0) Thank | ysszh

Hello, I submitted my paper on December 3, 2024, and it was under review on December 15. Until now, it is still stuck at "5 under review, 4 under review." Two reviewers provided their comments within two days.

(0) Thank | 线子嘞

2024.12.3: Submitted for review;
2024.12.15: Under review;
As of now, 2025.3.12: Under review.

(0) Thank | 线子嘞

2024.09.28 submitted to journal
2024.10.06 under review
2025.02.05 revise
2025.03.12 accept

(0) Thank | XiaLk

February 19, 2025 under review
February 20, 2025 The fourth reviewer accepted the review
March 5, 2025 rrc
March 6, 2025 Accept

(0) Thank | Cessy

I suggest waiting a little longer, as my second review took over three months. I sent an email to the editor during my second review after two months.

(0) Thank | Cessy

2024.8.13 submit
2024.8.19 under review
2025.2.19 rrc
2025.2.21 dip
2025.3.5 reject

(0) Thank | 竹杖芒鞋

The first essay was submitted in April 2024. It underwent two rounds of revisions, with responses exceeding 30 pages, and I am feeling a bit tired. It was submitted on April 30, 2024, and is currently under review as of May 10, 2024. After major revisions, it was resubmitted on August 20, 2024. A minor revision was requested on February 25, 2025, and the revised version was resubmitted on February 27, 2025. Finally, it was accepted on March 3, 2025.

(0) Thank | 十一月南瓜

Submitted in April last year
Under review on April 30, 2024
Major revision on May 10, 2024
Revised submission on August 20, 2024
Minor revision on February 25, 2025
Revised submission on February 27, 2025

(0) Thank | 十一月南瓜

I have also been dipping for ten days. I dipped on February 19th and still have no results.

(0) Thank | Lovanka

2025.11.25 submission
2025.12.15 under review (4 revisions required)
Until now

Could it be that this paper has been completely forgotten?

(0) Thank | 博士升

Who are your reviewers?

(0) Thank | cm

Send to 3 reviewers, one accepted the review after a week, completed the review in one day, and then DIP.

(1) Thank | cm