May 18, 2020, submitted to journal; May 18, 2020 with editor; May 19, 2020, Under Review; June 18, 2020, Revise. The editor's opinion plus three reviewers' opinions, a total of more than 30 comments were received. A month was given for revision. The first reviewer was more interested in the content of the article and generally satisfied with the manuscript. The comments he raised was also more pertinent and comprehensive (12 comments were made by him alone). July 14, 2020, revision submitted to journal; August 5, 2020 revise. The second review comments returned. The editor had two requirements for formats. Reviewer 1 raised 6 more questions based on the replies to the first review. Both reviewers 2 and 3 said that there are no more questions. This time 15 days were given for revision. August 17, 2020, revision submitted to journal; August 17, 2020, with editor; August 18, 2020, Under Review; August 24, 2020, Accept. It seems that there was information from the editorial office still needed to be filled in. The new IF this year has also reached 8.2. It is a very responsible and efficient top journal, and I will continue to support ECM in the future.

(7) Thank | Lovely_Sunshine

Submitted to Journal: 2019.11.11; With Editor: 2019.11.12; Under Review: 2019.11.13; Under Review: 2019.11.21; Under Editor Evaluation: 2019.12.11; Revise (Recommendation-From Reviews and Editor) within one month: 2019.12.19; Revision Submitted to Journal: 2020.1.13; With Editor: 2020.1.14; Under Review: 2020.1.14; Accept Pending Journal Confirmation: 2020.1.22 (choose one to confirm from ECM and ECMX; the latter is open source; we selected ECM, only replaced the Cover Letter, and other files cannot be modified and replaced); Revision Submitted to Journal: 2020.1.25 (the first day of the year Geng Zi); With Editor: 2020.1.27; Completed-Accept: 2020.1.27.

(3) Thank | 仝了个仝飞

This was my first submission; the speed was very fast. The editors and reviewers were very professional. There were more than 50 comments given by the 5 reviewers and editor in the first review, which was helpful to the revision and improvement of the manuscript! Share you the process: Submitted to journal: 11.09; with editor: 11.10; under review: 11.10; under editor evaluation: 11.24; under editor evaluation: 11.29; under editor evaluation: 11.30; revise (modify—general changes): 12.02; revision submitted to journal: 12.20; with editor: 12.22; under review: 12.22; under editor evaluation: 01.24; revise (revise—specific changes): 01.24; revision submitted to journal: 01.26; with editor: 01.28; accept: 01.28.

(34) Thank | 小神鹿

7 month review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Under review as of 3.31, 0 0 8
Reviewer with a soft heart

(0) Thank | 李力

3.31 Good communication with reviewers.

(0) Thank | 圆圆的脑袋

Has Rodrigo A Escobar been assigned to edit this? How is the progress going?

(0) Thank | 李力

3.20 Date Change, Deputy Editor-in-Chief Assigned, Currently Still with Editor.

(0) Thank | 李力

0325 UR
Sending for review in the early morning.

(0) Thank | hw

3.10 submitted by we
3.12 we changed the date and sent it to deputy editor Siir Kilkis
It's still we until now
I checked the comments below, the deputy editor is handling it quite slowly.

(0) Thank | hw

After submitting the manuscript on March 12th, have we received any updates? Or is it still waiting for evaluation?

(0) Thank | 风清扬

Does it mean that once it's sent to the deputy editor, it's basically ready for review?

(0) Thank | hw

I am also an editor, it seems that we need three reviewers to proceed...I am only one.

(0) Thank | wumign

I haven't given my feedback yet, the two reviewers have finished their reviews, how about you?

(0) Thank | 杨大厨

May I ask how many reviewers have provided feedback after reviewing it?

(0) Thank | wumign

Let's still consult the editor, usually with at least 2 reviewers.

(0) Thank | 秋日海棠

Can I ask everyone whether this journal cannot make a decision without three opinions?

(0) Thank | 杨大厨

3.20 UR 0 0 3

(0) Thank | 圆圆的脑袋

Hello, may I ask if all three invited experts have accepted the review, but only two of them have provided feedback?

(0) Thank | 圆圆的脑袋

It takes about half a year from submission to acceptance, with UR taking more than 2 months. Three experts were invited, but only 2 provided feedback in the end. After R1 submission, there was a delay of more than 1 month before receiving editing feedback. The editor decided to accept the submission after R2 submission.

(2) Thank | ljyyl

We have transferred the message to the deputy editor a week ago but still haven't heard back. What's going on?

(0) Thank | hw

Excuse me, is there any follow-up? I submitted 18 pieces, and after submitting it was "with editor". But now it's still the same, and the time hasn't changed. According to the usual speed, results should have been released by now.

(0) Thank | 风清扬

Please submit with editor on March 19, 2025. Please, I beg for a review.

(0) Thank | 李力

Is the traffic slow? Have you found the reviewer now?

(0) Thank | 逸仙888

How long is the review period for reviewers of this journal? I have sent manuscripts to three reviewers, and it has been over a month without receiving any feedback from them. Could it be that they have all disappeared? What should I do in this situation?

(1) Thank | 求求大家别卷了