The direction is metal bulk electrodeposition. Now there are not many articles about deposition published on EA, or most of them are related to batteries. 9.9 Submission; 10.22 revision comments returned, and there’s only one reviewer, with 6 comments; 10.24 revised submission; 10.25 it was sent back for revision again. The reviewer was really tough and must get a satisfactory answer; 10.28 after we carefully revised the paper and replied to the reviewer, it was submitted again; 10.29 accepted. The editor was P. Allongue. This was the first time I submitted to EA. The article was carefully prepared. From raising the idea to writing the patent, conducting the experiment, and then being delayed by the epidemic, we spent more than a year. But such a result was worthy of the hard work.

(28) Thank | chantonfi

Submitted on February 25, 2020 and under review on March 1. We waited a long time for 2 months, and when I was preparing to urge the manuscript, I received the review comments on May 7. It turned out that the editor sent the review comments of other people's articles to me. I wrote to the editor the same day to explain the situation, and it was under review again that night. I was worried that it could be another long wait. Fortunately, the editor sent me the correct review comments two days later, and explained the reason for the 2-month review cycle was that one of the reviewers has not been reached, and the email reminder has not been responded. In the end, only one reviewer’s opinion was returned. A minor revision was required for changing the format and title. I finally got the luck at the right time. Returned on May 11 and accepted on May 14. They sent the copyright agreement on May 21, and the proof on May 26. Then it was online on May 31. What I want to say is that sometimes EA does have a review cycle of more than two months. I have encountered this several times. So it's best to go to EA's official website to see how long the average cycle is for the recently published articles. The data in LetPub is for reference only.

(7) Thank | bohemian

With the thankful thing that the associate editor was downgraded to Q2, let me talk about my submission experience. After submitting the manuscript, it took three and a half months for the first review, and the comments finally came back. There were four reviewers in total. Three reviewers’ comments came back and all were positive. However, one of the reviewers was a freak who didn’t understand my article according to his comments. I verified and supplemented the data for a month. Two months after return, the freak reviewer was still not satisfied without reason two months after returning the manuscript. In the end, the fucking editor rejected it. It took full six months. This editor is too terrible. I will never submit to this junk journal in the future. It was really pleasant that this journal dropped to Q2.

(85) Thank | 往上走

Let’s write about my review process. I used to think that EA reviewed the manuscripts quickly before submitting. Now, looking at my submission process and everyone’s, I feel that it is really slow, and my love for EA has dropped a lot. It’s better not to submit to it again. It’s too slow. 2019.6.10 submitted to the journal; 2019.7.1 under review; 2019.7.6 under editor evaluation; 2019.7.14 under editor evaluation; 2019.7. 30 Still under evaluation. I don’t know what exactly the editors are doing.

(7) Thank | asdfdsa

February 7: Submitted the article. March 17: Made reply to the first review comments. April 15: first revision resubmitted. April 30: The time of under review was changed. May 17: The time of under review was changed again. I'm tired and exhausted, because the college requires more than two articles to get the master’s degree. I'm waiting for the second article, or I cannot get my job. The college requires the submission of a degree application on May 31. I hope everyone can cheer me up! Hope I can get my degree successfully! I will definitely come back to reciprocate!

(36) Thank | shiny001

3 reviewers. High requirement for innovation. Be very detailed and careful in your replies.

(0) Thank | andersonyi@613.com

The major has been changed to Chemistry.

(0) Thank | 醇色9

Finally back to District Two.

(0) Thank | 不爬树的猴子

3.14已提交至期刊。

(0) Thank | Dannie爱喝绿豆泥

In the past, I used to actively review manuscripts, which also indicates that either the influence of the journal did not impress other reviewers, or the editor did not properly select reviewers, resulting in mismatched reviews.

(0) Thank | 大侠大大大

The submission rate has dropped by almost 40%. From Zone One to Zone Three, the next four zones are not far off. The trend of continued decline is almost irreversible.

(0) Thank | 大侠大大大

Hello, do all authors need to click on the link to give their consent before submitting it?

(0) Thank | zhoushangyan

8.29 Submitted to Journal
9.11 under review
10.12 revision
10.27 Revision Submitted
10.31 Accepted

(0) Thank | chenzzzzzz

The official account of AISWEI Research Publishing House.

(0) Thank | Xin中！

Where can I see which reviewer is reviewing?

(0) Thank | Fly163

Where can I find out who the nth reviewer is?

(0) Thank | Fly163

How long will "under review" take?

(1) Thank | chenzzzzzz

It took 11 months? There is no one else who can match this speed.

(0) Thank | sophia

How is it going now? I submitted my manuscript around the same time as you, but there has been no one reviewing it.

(0) Thank | sophia

Is this classification based on major categories or subcategories? If it is not related to materials and belongs to electrochemistry.

(0) Thank | sophia

Fuel cell related, three weeks have passed since submission, four invitations have been sent out but no one has accepted the review. Is this journal's speed so slow?

(1) Thank | sophia

It's much faster than expected.

(0) Thank | SZ

Is there a chance to return to the top of the second district for this journal?

(0) Thank | 无厘头九

So slow, submitted in early June, it's been two full months and still under review. The first reviewer finished in three days, but the second reviewer took a month to find and another month to review. Too slow.

(0) Thank | JIAyang CAI

How come this editor started working on weekends? Even though it finally finished with the editor...

(0) Thank | 流程再快一点！