The review is fast. It was submitted on September 3, the result returned on September 28th, requiring major revisions. Resubmitted on October 16th, and the results returned on October 30th, requiring minor revisions. I revised it and sent it back today. Now we’re waiting for the final result.

(0) Thank | 亲爱的小树

My research is about biosensor. Submitted on January 25th before the Chinese New Year, and on March 26th, a major revision was required to be made within 6 weeks. There were 4 reviewers in total, the first reviewer had 8 questions, the second one asked 4 questions, and the third reviewers raised two questions, mainly talking about literature issues, but affirmed our innovation. The fourth reviewer asked 3 questions. We made up the experiment and wrote a response letter, which was submitted on May 3 the day before the deadline. On May 20, we received a reply from the editor saying that it had been accepted.

(2) Thank | 亲爱的同学

1 month review. 2 reviewers. I think the editor is good.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The review process was quick. After submitting the manuscript, it took only 18 days to receive the revision comments. After making the changes, it was accepted the next day.

(0) Thank | HoLmez

9月21号When I selectd out, I came back to review the comments on October 12th. The two reviewers asked a lot of questions. After answering them, they went out again on November 8th. They received the notice on November 17, and now they can see it online.My article is fast!

(0) Thank | 123885621@qq.com

to select at the end of June, return to overhaul in early August, but the reviewer only mentioned a few simple questions.Two electron micrographs were added, and they were submitted at the end of August. After 2 days, the notification was received, and the overall situation was very fast.The editor is very good. When the proof is sent, the editor will reply quickly.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

I have encountered two reviewers. I gave the review comments in a little over three weeks, overhauled.After a week, he gave advice to Xiao Xiu, and received it three days after the minor repair.I feel that the editor is quite responsible, and the overall time is shorter.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11After the doctoral degree, he selectd for one, four reviewers, one of which gave a major revision. Although the time went through a long time, it was finally finished.The impression I gave was that the journal cycle was a bit long.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted an article on lithium battery, was told that the innovation is not enough, and gave an article as a reference, but in fact I am completely different from that article...

(2) Thank | Anonymous

2010 2.721

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4109

(2) Thank | Anonymous

just submitted a sensorThe article, because the innovation is not rejected, the editor is responsible for the Greater China region of China, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, I feel very responsible, don't forget to help me!

(37) Thank | Anonymous