First review: submission on November 14, 2019; First review result results received on December 26, 2019. Four reviewers, requiring a major revision. Two of the reviewers’ comments were very helpful, another one didn’t understand me too much, and the other one asked for more experiments. On the whole, the reviewer's comments were not difficult to respond, and the revision was submitted after half a month with the supplementary test. Second review: submission on January 13, 2020. Second review result returned on February 10, 2019. All four reviewers said that the revision was very good, and there were no other comments. It was finally accepted. I feel that the managing editor from Singaporean was very responsible and found the reviewer very quick. The editor was assigned one day after submission at the first review, and the reviewer was found within 6 days. So the review was fast.

(4) Thank | alpha_

First submission: July 2019 First review. From early July to early October 2019, there were three reviewers. The first and third reviewers gave good review comments. The second reviewer asked many questions, and editor requested moderate revisions. Everyone’s questions were carefully answered. A lot of simulations, data, and references were added into the manuscript and revised manuscript was returned and submitted at the end of October 2019. The second review: from the end of October 2019 to middle of December 2019, there were still the same three reviewers in the first review. The first reviewer agreed to accept the manuscript, and the second one still had three questions. The third reviewer had a question about the format, and the editor requested minor revision. Each reviewer’s questions were carefully answered, especially the second reviewer’s questions. And revised manuscript was returned and submitted at the end of December 2019. The third review: From the end of December 2019 to the beginning of January 2020, the three reviewers all stated that they had no problems and the editors agreed to accept it. First of all, this was the second time to be accepted by EPSR, and I was very happy. I have two comments for the journal: one is that the EPSR review speed is not bad, and the second is that the reviewers are very professional and put forward many valuable opinions.

(7) Thank | leoleo

The review speed is very slow. It stayed in the editor’s hands for a month, and then another two months in the reviewers’ hand, then reviewer’s comments returned and it was rejected directly. Of the three reviewers, the first one offered a few comments requiring minor revisions; the second was more serious and gave some comments on the technical content, with a mild tone; the third reviewer’s comments were unbelievable! He didn’t even look at it carefully. All the problems mentioned were that I did not mention this or that, and the tone was very bad, but in fact, everything was clearly stated in the article. The reviewer was too irresponsible. The editor might not carefully check whether the reviewer's comments were consistent with the actual situation, and when he saw that the third reviewer had such a bad opinion, he just rejected it. I was also shocked. Will not submit to it anymore. It’s a waste of time and they do not take it seriously.

(18) Thank | 风马牛不相及

Th editor is quite good. 1.5 months given for revision.

(9) Thank | 青羽

Hey, are the text inside the table also double-spaced?

(0) Thank | 又被拒稿

Bro, what's going on with the formatting of your first draft? Do we need double spacing inside the tables as well?

(2) Thank | 又被拒稿

I have been waiting for more than ten months for submission, and it has been over two months since the second review. Only one of the two reviewers has provided feedback, and despite my reminders, there has been no response. I don't know how long I have to wait.

(0) Thank | 林虑

It's strange, the article says they are accepting submissions, but it doesn't mention how to submit the final draft. Can anyone knowledgeable tell me? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | 7868

How did the blogger solve it? It seems very difficult to reduce the number of pages to 22.

(0) Thank | 旦逢良辰顺颂时宜

The submission was rejected and needs to be resubmitted within two days. If you need to resubmit, please ensure that the research paper does not exceed 22 pages of A4 paper, and the review article does not exceed 30 pages of A4 paper. The format should be single-column, double-spaced, with 3 cm wide margins, font size 12, and include all figures, tables, appendices, references, footnotes, etc. However, it seems that the submission exceeds the required number of pages by quite a lot.

(0) Thank | 香喷喷的秋裤

Hello, the article has been received but it did not mention how to submit the final draft. Where should I submit the final draft?

(0) Thank | 7868

There is a small issue, the article indicates it has been received, but it does not provide a way to submit the final draft. Where should I submit the final draft?

(2) Thank | 7868

On April 1st, 2025, three new reviewers were invited, and one of them accepted the invitation.

(0) Thank | li shilei

I waited for twenty days, and he invited three more reviewers. I feel like there's no need to rush.

(0) Thank | li shilei

2024.12.27 manuscript submitted
2025.1.11 major revision
2025.1.24 revision submitted
2025.2.6 minor revision
2025.2.10 revision submitted
2025.3.16 accept

The review process is very fast, with initial comments received within two weeks of submission. After two revisions within three months, the paper is accepted. After acceptance, there is a three-day proofreading process, followed by online publication within a week.

(0) Thank | 电溢气凝

Submitted on March 30, under review on April 2, not sure how long to wait, hoping for a good outcome.

(0) Thank | 冬冬

Submitted on March 10th, finally under review on March 30th, looking forward to a good outcome.

(0) Thank | moa

Dear experts, how long does this journal typically take to make a decision on whether to review? It's been two weeks under review with no new reviewers accepting the review invitation and no new invitations sent out. Not sure what to do, can we follow up on the review process?

(0) Thank | 请回答2024

Hello, may I ask if the formatting requirement is only font size 12, double spacing, single column layout, and overall not exceeding 22 pages?

(0) Thank | 冬冬

It has been over 9 months since the initial submission, and it has been a month and a half since the second review. Two reviewers have provided feedback, but one reviewer has not yet returned their comments.

(0) Thank | 林虑

Hello, I would like to ask about the formatting issues. Should I only use 12-point font and double spacing for the main text? What are the formatting requirements for the abstract and references? I couldn't find any relevant information on the official website. Would you mind adding me as a friend? Thank you for your time!

(0) Thank | a bowl of paper

Hello, may I ask if only the body text is in 12-point font and double-spaced? What are the formatting requirements for the abstract and references? I couldn't find any relevant content on the official website.

(0) Thank | a bowl of paper

3.25 Initial submission
3.26 Returned due to formatting issues, resubmitted after revision
3.27 WE

(1) Thank | Kelly Qiu

When can we move from "WE" to under review?

(0) Thank | GSJDOBE

It's been two weeks with the editor, I'm getting anxious, when will it finally be under review?

(0) Thank | moa