Submission completed - Format review - Editor's initial review - Peer review - Review completed - Editor's final review - Author revision

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Almost all academically reviewed manuscripts that meet the publication requirements need to be returned to the authors for revisions before being published, such as compressing the length of the article, redesigning tables, improving the quality of illustrations, and limiting the use of irregular abbreviations. However, returning the manuscript to the authors for revisions does not mean that the article has been accepted; the final acceptance of the article depends on whether the author's modifications to the critical content and expression of the article meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors. Typically, materials returned to the authors for revisions include the original manuscript, reviewers' comments, and a covering letter from the editor. When authors receive the revised manuscript, they should first carefully read the modification letter and the reviewers' comments. They should then consider whether they can or are willing to accept the opinions of the reviewers or the editor and make revisions to the manuscript. The likelihood of acceptance can be seen from the responses of the editor and reviewers. Revisions should not be rushed; authors should carefully read and understand the issues raised by the reviewers. They should respond to each reviewer's comments individually and clearly indicate the specific changes made in the revised manuscript (page, lines). In their response to the editor, they should thank them for the suggested modifications and explain the reasons for any changes that were not made

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the return process?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

What is the process for peer review?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

It's just okay if I can graduate. My senior brother published a paper last year and also successfully graduated. So everything will be fine

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁