The magazine is not good, with high requirements and a long review cycle. It is not recommended to submit.

(0) Thank | 郭博

If the main part has been completed, it is recommended to start with the results; if the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction first

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

This varies from person to person. If the main results have been completed, it is generally recommended to start from the results. If the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why is it recommended to start writing a research article from the results section? Is it okay to start writing from the methods section?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

What is the usual writing order of a research article?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Hello, may I ask how long it took for your manuscript to be reviewed? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 碧水文石

Hello, may I ask how your article turned out? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 碧水文石

Hello, how did your article turn out in the end? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 碧水文石

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Rejected by editor within two weeks

(0) Thank | 坠星羽腾

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Just received a manuscript this morning, after minor revisions editor suggested language polishing is needed, can be accepted! (ashamed) My English level as a graduate student is too poor, I was lazy myself, after business polishing, returned for minor revisions twice, accepted in 10 days. Not open access, no fees. Efficiency is good. Can submit on stem cells. Previously submitted a related review was rejected. So, the acceptance rate is 50%

(0) Thank | 北国丹烟

There may not be any major changes this year, but we'll see in the future

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Submitted for 47 days still with editor

(0) Thank | 北国丹烟

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The review is too slow! It's been a month since submission, and still with editor

(0) Thank | 怜翠少爷

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Actually, the publication is not bad, but there are too few people who know about it. In addition, the topics are narrow. Those who study stem cells can give it a try. It's not too difficult

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

So steady, just a little bit stronger, isn't it just breaking 3 points? It's really difficult

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Can we reach 3 points next year? Let's talk about it

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Last year our laboratory published a paper by Wang R, Liang J, Yu HM, Liang H, Shi YJ, Yang HT. Retinoic acid maintains self-renewal of murine embryonic stem cells via a feedback mechanism. Differentiation. 2008 Nov;76(9):931-45. However, the publication process was too slow. It took 3 months for peer review and acceptance, and another half a year for publication

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This magazine is not well-known by many people. In fact, it does not have many sources of articles, and it is open to a variety of topics, including stem cells, cell apoptosis, and cell differentiation. If there are similar articles that are well-researched, they can be published very successfully

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁