5 months, rejection

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

None

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

November 9th, and still no news

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

Today, November 9, no news, too slow, I'm planning to withdraw the submission

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

Any news?

(0) Thank | 霸王欢欢

Do you have any news?

(0) Thank | 是向兰吖

Have you received any news?

(0) Thank | 是向兰吖

Today is September 10th, still no news ?

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

Any news yet?

(0) Thank | 风陵迎春

Hello, did you receive it in the end?

(0) Thank | 是向兰吖

Research focus: Systematic review
Sharing of experience: Submitted on July 7th, was told to expect results in 3-4 weeks. Today is August 12th and it's still under review. ???

(0) Thank | 骊泓来了

Review Speed: 2.0 | Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted on July 14th, received reviewer comments on August 25th. The comments were relatively positive, suggesting revisions for further review. Acceptance is not guaranteed

(0) Thank | 书生小雨

Simply accept the editor's suggested changes if you agree with them. If you disagree, write your reasons directly below the comments and then provide feedback to the editor. If there are conflicting opinions, negotiate further

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When responding to reviewers' comments, all questions must be answered one by one without omission; try to meet the experimental requirements mentioned in the comments, and provide reasonable reasons if unable to meet them; references recommended by reviewers must be cited and thoroughly discussed; when submitting the revised manuscript, be sure to check the corrections made in the original manuscript.

If you agree with the modifications suggested by the journal editor, you can directly accept the changes. If you disagree, write down your reasons below the comments, then provide feedback to the editor. If there is a disagreement, negotiate further

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to respond to comments from journal editors?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

What are the differences between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to the editor's comments?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Research focus: Diabetes; self-management; systematic evaluation experience sharing: The submission was under review the day after it was submitted, and it was expected to receive results in 3-4 weeks. However, a rejection letter was received in the second week. The editor-in-chief reviewed the submission first, and if it didn't pass, it was rejected without any feedback. Planning to submit directly to another journal

(0) Thank | 苍风保胜

Is this magazine worth submitting?

(0) Thank | Hermosa Henry

Hello teacher! Could you please advise me on the process of data disclosure for this magazine? Is it mandatory to disclose? Thank you very much and looking forward to your reply!

(0) Thank | 中原新勇

Is nobody submitting now? I submitted my paper for review the next day and they said they will provide feedback in 3 to 4 weeks. Is this a faster process now? ?

(0) Thank | 辉夜碧秋

This journal does not accept basic science articles. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans

(0) Thank | 明冠慕卉

Is "Under Review" means that the editor is reviewing it?

(0) Thank | 以冬少女

3 points margin, hoping to remain stable, a slight increase is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

After submitting a contribution to this magazine, will it be under review internally by the editorial team or sent for external review?

(0) Thank | 书雁酱

Is there a layout fee?

(0) Thank | 大力弘毅