6.4 submit
6.5 under review
7.6 minor revision
7.11 revise submit
7.12 reviewer 1 accept
7.22 reviewer 2 minor revise
7.23 revise submit
7.24 reviewer 2 minor revise
7.25 revise submit
7.26 accept
The review process is progressing quickly, and the experts are very strict, responsible, and serious in reviewing. The revisions are very detailed.

(0) Thank | Aiwa

The submission was accepted within a month, which was very quick

(1) Thank | JimPN

Is the review process fast for this journal now? What is the acceptance rate like?

(0) Thank | 弹腿盼丹

The editing result is very good, and the grammar meets the requirements

(0) Thank | cool

The quality of this journal article is good. The first review result will be out within one month after submission, and the reviewers should be from abroad. They are very professional and provided many constructive suggestions for revisions. The acceptance came around 10 days after the revisions were made

(0) Thank | vens

The author should first conduct a search and analysis in SCI and Scopus databases; secondly, it is important to carefully read the submission guidelines of the target journal for submission preparation, carefully review the table of contents and relevant articles of the recent issues of the journal to confirm if they are relevant to the content of their manuscript

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The submission process usually starts from high to low. A moderate understanding of your own article is sufficient, with 2-3 levels of understanding

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Do you need to set journal grades from high to low when selecting publications? How many grades are usually set?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How to evaluate the impact factor of your own article, or how to better position your article?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

Submitted a review article on insect immunology on April 30, 2021. Made two minor revisions during the review process. Accepted on June 8th and published online on June 10th. It seems that there is only one review article in each issue of the journal, while the rest are research articles. The journal demands high quality articles, especially for reviews, with strict language requirements, sufficient evidence, beautiful figures and tables, and innovative comments. This is my first review article and a very good journal! Looking forward to even better future publications!

(16) Thank | wstqgt

Hello, I would like to ask, does "DCI显示submitted to journal" mean the submission process is completed? When co-authors receive the DCI email, is it necessary to click on that verification link for confirmation?

(0) Thank | 小明朗吖

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Just got one accepted, the editor's efficiency is very high. After the review, the acceptance was received on the same day and it was online in the second week. Very efficient

(0) Thank | 巴蜀瑞松

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted in early May, received feedback in June, revised two weeks later, and accepted on the same day

(0) Thank | 暗月寺成弘

If it's just gene function?

(0) Thank | 残月山兰

What are you doing? May invest. Major overhaul in early July. Minor repairs returned at the end of July. Acceptance

(0) Thank | 残月山兰

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submitted in May. Major revisions in early July. Minor revisions returned by the end of July. Accepted

(0) Thank | 坠星香岚

What about now? PINO864238ac 2017-05-13 publication::Research directions: Immunology; gene function; acceptance rate: about 25% Review time: about three months Submitted on March 8th, and still no news yet. Asked and was told that one reviewer has already submitted comments, not recommending acceptance, and now waiting for the second one. If the second reviewer's opinion differs from the first one, then it will be sent to a third reviewer... Feeling anxious. Can I reconsider other journals now?

(0) Thank | 坠星香岚

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: It is valuable to carefully revise the review comments and accept the suggestions given after the revision

(0) Thank | 半月成济

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Sharing of experience: Submitted on the 3.8, still no news. Asked and was told that one reviewer's opinion has been received, which is not recommended for acceptance. Now waiting for a second opinion, and if it differs from the first, will have to go to a third reviewer... Feeling quite anxious. Should I reconsider submitting to other journals?

(0) Thank | 半月成济

Review Speed: 1.0 experience sharing: Submitted on March 8, 2016, returned in 2 weeks, with two reviewers suggesting minor and major revisions, a total of 4 experiments added... Revised in late June, accepted a week later

(0) Thank | 螳螂香柳

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Sharing of experience: The decision to send a submission for external review is based on whether the editor knows the author. If a few submissions are made and they are directly rejected, similar articles may still be published. Therefore, it is not recommended to submit in this case!

(0) Thank | Lisa Saroyan

Submitted at the end of November, revised in mid-December, which took about 17 to 18 days. Added an experiment, made final revisions a few days before Chinese New Year, and got accepted in just two days

(0) Thank | 长安栾同

Don't settle for mediocrity, if you're going to be rejected anyway, might as well aim for something better. Thumbs down!

(0) Thank | 震雷又冬

Damn, what's going on? The exchange rate was 3.7 when I invested, but it dropped to 2.8 shortly after

(0) Thank | 平筠大叔

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The editor is very nice, reviews quickly and carefully, language requirements are average. My initial draft was not polished, so it needed major revisions and suggested to polish it. After polishing and resubmitting, it was accepted the next day

(0) Thank | 平筠大叔