1.6 Submission
3.27 Reject
4.5 Resubmission
4.6 With Editor
4.8 Under Review 3
4.9 1 person agrees
4.20 One person reviewed
4.26 Invite one person
5.06 Invite 2 people
5.15 Invite one person
5.17 One person agrees to review
5.21 RRC
5.28 Major revision after DIP (14 questions from two people)
6.6 Resubmit with editor
6.16 Under review, sent to 2 people
6.17 One person accepts
6.25 Invite one more person
6.26 One person reviewed
7.11 Editor urges reviewers
7.13 One person accepts
7.20 RRC
7.28 DIP
7.29 Major revision returned the same day (1 person had no comments, 1 person had 6 questions)
8.6 Under review, sent to two people, one person accepted on the same day
8.13 One person reviewed
8.15 Urging reviewers
8.18 Reviewer accepts
8.24 RRC
8.25 Under review, additional 12 people invited
8.27 One person accepts
8.29 RRC
9.1 DIP
9.2 Minor revision returned the same day with editor (3 people, 1 accepted, 1 had 1 question, 1 had 5 questions)
9.15 DIP
9.16 Accepted

(0) Thank | 花林

This article has a submission cycle of 8 months, and has gone through rejection, resubmission, major revisions, minor revisions, acceptance, as well as situations like reviewers disappearing and slow handling by the handling editor. The journal is of good quality but just a bit slow, so students in a hurry to publish should proceed with caution. Additionally, it is not recommended for computer science submissions as the editor-in-chief is not from a computer science background and delegates decision-making to the handling editor, resulting in numerous rounds of revisions for me.

(1) Thank | 花林

I'm sorry, but I have to reject your proposal.

(0) Thank | sx234com

4.21 submitted
4.22 With Editor
4.24 Under Review
6.7 Required Reviews Completed
6.10 Major Revision
6.14 Submitted (With Editor)
6.17 Under Review
6.24 Reviews completed: 1
6.26 Required Reviews Completed
7.1 Minor in Revision
7.1 Submitted (With Editor)
7.3 With Editor
7.8 Accept
7.14 Online Publish

(0) Thank | OMK

After rewriting the paper six months later, I submitted it to this journal again. Here is the record of the submission process:
2024-8-27 submit to journal
2024-8-28 with editor

(0) Thank | sx234com

Submission Record
5.14 Submitted
5.23 Under review

(0) Thank | chaossss

Which direction are we heading in? I submitted it on February 8th, almost two months ago. I have invited 11 people, but only one has accepted the review

(0) Thank | 枫0

Hello, I would like to ask if the format for revised manuscripts needs to follow the format (double columns) of the papers already published in this journal?

(0) Thank | 嗨皮牛耶

Triple kill, just switched to here, looking forward to good results
2024-3-9 submit to journal
2024-3-9 with editor
2024-3-10 reject (out of scope

(0) Thank | sx234com

Crop protection submission process
2023.6.2 submitted
2023.6.3 under review
2023.8.21 major revision
2023.9.8 revised manuscript
2023.9.11 accepted
The journal processes submissions quickly, but the reviewers are a bit slow! Initially sent to 4 reviewers, only one agreed to review. Then sent to 5 more, with no response for a long time, followed by sending to 10 more reviewers. The article required major revisions, with over 10 revision suggestions, mainly focused on language edits. Overall, the submission timeline was average, with the main delay being due to the reviewers

(1) Thank | 张森0

Don't select for this journal, the review period is very long, one year.After the submission, I received the news of the overhaul after 6 months.I refused to submit a draft after 6 months of overhaul.The editor-in-chief requires a repetitive test. It is necessary to repeat the test in two different batches of biology. If there is no suggestion, don't select for it.Important things say three times very slow very slow very slow

(0) Thank | 默默

17.7.14Submission17.7.27 peer review17.8.1 Overhaul17.8.27 Submission after overhaul17.8.30 Overhaul again (because of typographic problems)17.9.7 Submission after major overhaul17.9.26 minor repair17.10.4 Accept (Mid-Autumn Festival Gift)Waiting for online.....

(0) Thank | 垚

I feel that the speed of the first trial is a bit slow,My article went out for 4 months before I answered it. In the case of the draft, I gave it a major overhaul and repaired it. I accepted it in the editor's hand for half a month.I feel that the editorial attitude is still good.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I feel that this journal is more suitable for doingThe students of the Daejeon test submitted the manuscript, and the review period was generally more than three months. It is relatively fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous