This is a pertinent review journal. In general, the reviewers are reasonable and offer constructive and critical suggestions that improve both the scientific content and language of your paper. This is a decent journal with a fair review policy.

(0) Thank | 老风

How long have you been waiting for the review, OP? Have you received any feedback yet?

(0) Thank | 知了知了

Very slow. The manuscript was sent for external review in June 23 years ago and has not yet been returned. I have reminded the editor twice that only one reviewer's comments have been received, and we are still waiting.

(0) Thank | 知了知了

How long did it take for you to review it, teacher? It's been over a month now and I'm still at the "with journal administrator" stage

(0) Thank | Channing Timothy

Brother/sister, can you please give me a timeline? Mine is still in decision pending, and I don't want to stay awake all night anymore.

(0) Thank | 贼努力

Submitted on January 17th in recent years, it took one week to be "With Editor" and another week to be "Out for Review". This status lasted for more than 5 months. During this period, a reminder was sent after 3 months, and it was mentioned that only one reviewer's feedback had been received, while waiting for the other reviewer's feedback. After the external review was completed, the results were received within 3 days, and both reviewers suggested minor revisions. Overall, the email responses were timely, and the editor's attitude was good, but the process took too long.

(0) Thank | 一只小鲤鱼

May I ask what your current situation is? It has been one month since my audit

(0) Thank | 神照学文

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: One of my articles has been in external review for over three months

(0) Thank | 碧桃篷骏

How long have you been under review when submitting? How long does the under review process take?

(0) Thank | chendru

After 3 months of submission, a reply was received requesting major revisions; what's ridiculous is that the reviewer rejected it, claiming not to have seen the response letter. What a waste of 4 whole months, quite frustrating.

(0) Thank | 被拒稿后脑壳痛

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Pathogenic microorganisms
Experience sharing: The review process is extremely slow, and the paper was rejected after the second review. It's just a review article, isn't it? The review comments were quite strange, and the efficiency was low

(0) Thank | 筑阳诗珊

The model diagram can vividly and directly display the overall idea of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Model diagram is to depict your theoretical model. This diagram is optional in submissions

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is a model diagram necessary?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

Is the use of a model diagram advantageous or disadvantageous for reviewers' attitudes towards a manuscript?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

Review journals, the reviewers are quite nice, gave a minor revision, did not raise any strange questions. Did not use a paper editing service, but submitted directly. The journal has a relatively fair review policy

(0) Thank | 平原梓云

2011 IF6.2, Zone 2, There is a currentIn the trial

(3) Thank | Anonymous

"In 2011, if6.2 in Area 2, there is currently an article under review."

(0) Thank | 西风傲菡

Bullish, will it rise again next year?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Research Focus: Microbiology; Gut Microbiota

(0) Thank | Harold Cecillia