The review cycle for your information: 2019.10.24, submission; 2019.4.1, major revision; 2020.5.9, the major revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.2, moderate revision; 2020.6.7, the moderate revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.9, accept. I submitted an article on machine learning in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers were very professional, and the editor were very responsible, and the manuscript was processed quickly. The review speed was faster than imagination. It is estimated that the impact factor will rise, I hope Clinical & Experimental Allergy gets better and better. 1) It took a long time for the first review; it was mainly because that it took a long time for inviting suitable reviewers; 2) Clinical & Experimental Allergy required the length of the manuscript to be as concise as possible, and it was mainly to shorten the length in the moderate revision required in the second review; 3) The editor emphasized that only the closely related references should be cited, and he didn’t like a lot of citations without plan.

(12) Thank | 张先森加油吖

Submission period for your reference: 2020.1.21 submission; 2020.3.4 major revision required; 2020.4.9 major revision submitted; 2020.5.5 minor revision required; 2020.5.9 Minor revision submitted; 2020.5.11 accepted; 2020.5.21 Proof; 2020.5.26 Online. I submitted an article on the application of artificial intelligence in agricultural remote sensing. The reviewers are quite professional, and the questions raised are sharp and detailed. (The result of the first review was a headache, and really hard to address!) The editor is very responsible and the manuscript is processed very quickly. The reviewing speed of CEA is much faster than in previous years. The impact factor of the journal is rising. I hope CEA will do better! Several complains: 1) The submission requirement clearly indicates "your paper your way". I followed the standard Trans formatting, and was required to resubmit three times by the editor due to formatting issues. In the end, it was formatted as single-column and double-spaced... 2) Late in the process, the proof is very slow. I remember that all my other papers were proofed on the second day of acceptance, but it was delayed for ten days in CEA.

(14) Thank | 那小子真坏

2019-5-5 Submission; 2019- 6-15 major revise; 2019-8-8 revised submission; 2019-10-2 under decision; 2019-10-18 accept. Generally speaking, it is quite fast. The manuscript was under review within a week or so after submission. The editor is very responsible, and the advice experts gave was also very professional. We carefully revised one by one according to the review comments, and replied one by one. It was the first time for me to write a SCI paper, and I am very happy to see it was accepted by Computer. I hope everyone will succussed in submission.

(10) Thank | 东河

All of the reviewer’s opinions and comments were pertinent and directly aided in improving the content of the article, the outline of the experiment and the writing. In general, to get into this journal, your research has to involve a relatively new method. The review speed is very fast, and the reviewers and editors are also very professional.

(4) Thank | TYNCASIA

2025.3.28 DIP
2025.4.3 DIP
The publication service query on wx is With Editor.

(0) Thank | 无敌流浪汉

It has been two months since submission to the editor, and it has been a week with the decision still in process without any response to my emails. I don't know what other methods there are to withdraw the submission.

(0) Thank | spike

Very slow! It has been two months with the editor, and the decision is still in process for over a week!

(0) Thank | spike

After submitting my manuscript, it only took two days to go from "with editor" to "Decision in Process". It has now been seven to eight days since the status changed to "Decision in Process". Does this mean it is essentially a rejection? How can I prompt the editor to reject it sooner so that I can quickly submit to a new journal?

(0) Thank | 我想发SCI

Yes, how long have you been investing for?

(0) Thank | 讨厌dip

How are you now? I went from "with editor" to "Decision in Process" on March 27th. It has been seven to eight days now in "Decision in Process," does that mean I have been rejected?

(0) Thank | 我想发SCI

After submitting my manuscript, it went from "with editor" to "Decision in Process" within two days. It has been seven to eight days since it reached "Decision in Process," does this mean it has been rejected?

(0) Thank | 我想发SCI

It's already very fast.

(0) Thank | 讨厌dip

24.12.8 WE
25.1.14 UR
25.3.21 2 2 20 RRC
25.3.27 Major Revision
The speed is really slow, this is the second submission, the first one was rejected after waiting almost a month in editing.

(0) Thank | 虔诚之歌

2025.3.26 STJ
2025.3.28 WE

Translated to English:
2025.3.26 STJ
2025.3.28 WE

(0) Thank | PT

Jinong also mentioned RRC in the conversation.

(0) Thank | 她说为了中非友谊

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | 书包

With the current impact factor at 8.3, it is estimated to break 9 soon.

(0) Thank | xibeixincheng

How do I withdraw my submission? Do I just send an email directly?

(0) Thank | BruceWong

I submitted it on February 6th, and it has been over a month now, but it is still in the "we" status. I have reminded them once, but it is still in the "we" status. How can I withdraw the submission?

(0) Thank | BruceWong

The initial review of the dip is just "g".

(0) Thank | 讨厌dip

Is it normal for DIP20 to last for more than 20 days?

(0) Thank | accept AAA

1.24WE, it is almost February now, still WE.

(0) Thank | 皓月争辉

On Jan 23, 2025 we
On Mar 17, 2025 we
On Mar 18, 2025 dip
We dip in three months.

(0) Thank | sdsdafa

CEA has been too slow in the past two years, more manpower should be added.

(0) Thank | luyuntao

It cannot be overcome, and it may not necessarily be achieved next year.

(0) Thank | 讨厌dip