After two rounds of revision, it was finally accepted. Generally speaking, it is slow. The first review lasted for 3 and a half months before a notification of major revision was received, and then it took 3 months until the revision was resubmitted. A notification of minor revision was received after 1 and a half months of the second review. Every decision in process took a long time, which made the waiting a bit anxious. The review comments were quite professional, but you only needed to answer carefully. After the first review, the revision of the article was completely upgraded to a higher level.

(1) Thank | 科研小弱鸡

Nov 25, 2019 With Editor; Dec 04, 2019 With Editor; Dec 18, 2019 With Editor; Dec 23, 2019 Under Review; Dec 30, 2019 Under Review; Jan 25, 2020 Required Reviews Completed; Jan 27, 2020 Decision in Process; Jan 28, 2020 Revise; Feb 13, 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; Feb 14, 2020 With Editor; Feb 17, 2020 With Editor; Feb 18, 2020 Under Review; Mar 17, 2020 Decision in Process; Mar 17, 2020 Accept.

(4) Thank | 大可math

The editor is very responsible. At the With Editor stage, after the editor-in-chief discussing with the deputy editor, they felt that my research content did not meet the journal’s aim and scope, and required me to try my best the field of mathematics and physics. It is hard to publish here.

(30) Thank | Legend

The impact factor of this journal is increasing year by year. In 2011, it reached 3.268. The review period is long; I have been waiting for my manuscript to be reviewed for 8 months. I’ve written the editor twice now. Still waiting.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

About three days

(0) Thank | Marty

Papers in the field of programming require code, and a summary is also needed

(0) Thank | Marty

Hello, I would like to ask the host, do all submitted journals for Computer Physics Communications require uploading of the source code? Do I need to write a "PROGRAM SUMMARY/NEW VERSION PROGRAM SUMMARY"?

(0) Thank | LYDIA......

When will the status change after submission?

(0) Thank | dixhsj

Received feedback after 2 months, spent nearly a month revising, and took 4 months to accept. The reviewers were very thorough and helpful in improving the paper. The impact factor this year is already around 7. Hoping for further improvements

(1) Thank | Marty

No, it is about the design and simulation of computation methods.

(0) Thank | 你的仿真收敛了么

May I ask if your article is about fluid simulation analysis?

(0) Thank | 左耳朵进水

2022.8.18, Submitted to Journal
2022.8.20, With Editor
2022.9.13, Urgent Review
2022.9.14, Under Review
2022.9.19, Under Review
2022.10.9, Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.10, Decision in Process
2022.10.12, Revise
2022.11.1, Revision Submitted to Journal
2022.11.2, With Editor
2022.11.3, With Editor
2022.11.4, Under Review
2022.11.14, Decision in Process
2022.11.15, Completed - Accept

The journal is biased towards computer programs, and I submitted a computer-related paper. Initially, the review process was delayed, but it was expedited after urging. The submission volume is not large, and the acceptance rate is relatively high. Overall, it is quite good and falls under the second-tier category, offering good value for money.

(2) Thank | 你的仿真收敛了么

May I ask how long the technical review process takes for this journal after submission? Is there any email notification when it is transferred from the technical editor to the editor-in-chief or associate editor? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | CFDJustin

Hello, may I ask how long the technical review process of this journal usually takes after submission? Is there a notification via email when it is transferred from the technical editor to the editor-in-chief or associate editor? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | CFDJustin

Is it always this slow to submit to this journal after one week?

(3) Thank | 时间不存在

This journal has always felt good.A somewhat innovative and relatively solid work can generally be published.

(0) Thank | Plum

This journal is very good, and the web of science influence factor is ranked No.1 in mathematics and physics.After three months of receiving, one reviewer put forward a very professional and meticulous question. After the revision, the quality of the paper was greatly improved.The special editor is also very nice, the overall review process is very rigorous, and the natural time will be longer.Not bad.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Also acceptd an article, lasted eight months

(1) Thank | Anonymous

super fast ah first day submission the next day under review 28 days review oneMore than two said that nicely written changed for more than half a month to submit a revised draft after three or four days to record. After another month on the network to see the journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Publishing period is invited by monthly

(0) Thank | Anonymous