The opponents mentioned that Applied Mathematical Modelling = 2*CMAME, which really made me laugh. AMM is known for the valueless papers it published. That is not convincing at all to say so. Pass. Next one, please start your show to entertain us.

(30) Thank | hydraul

Two months after submission, the comments of first review were returned, and it was accepted on the next day after revision. With the accumulation of the pioneers in 1970s and 1980s, there are many pioneering works, so it is inevitable that the self-citation rate is relatively high. The editor is an expert in the field of dynamics. The reviewers pay attentions to the innovation of the research, and are very rigorous in mathematics. Therefore, it helped a lot in improving the article.

(35) Thank | tjuasia

There is no doubt that this is the top publications of computational mechanics. A few authors stop talking nonsense here. I submitted it several times. This was the first one. The reviewers were very careful and conscientious. Some of the details were described very vaguely while it was easily saw through by reviewers. The review questions raised were very professional and very helpful to the article.

(34) Thank | 苦逼的搬砖狗

This journal seriously exaggerates its metrics. No joke. First, the self-citation rate is relatively high, and it is well-known that they inflate their impact factor. I am a doctoral student in the Department of Mechanics of Tsinghua University. I refuse to accept that JMPS is the top mechanics journal, followed by IJP and then IJES. I know this is a Euro journal, but honestly all these journals can’t be ranked appropriately. I mean, this journal should be ranked about 5th. Yeah, I mean this journal is much easier to get accepted in over other journals.

(0) Thank | 嫦娥一曲

Same question, what's the situation now?

(0) Thank | 科研民工哈

Hello, have your peers reviewed it?

(0) Thank | 岁岁年年入梦

25.03.17 submit to journal
25.03.18 with editor
25.03.20 with editor
The process with the editor is a bit slow this time, hopefully it will be reviewed soon. Good luck!

(0) Thank | 科研菜鸟

Two people

(0) Thank | 科研菜鸟

The editor checks the system every week, but only invites four reviewers each time. If they disagree, another four are invited. Three weeks have passed and only one person has accepted to review. It's frustrating. Everyone is busy lately, why is no one agreeing to review?

(0) Thank | JUN_Ghent

Hello, can a decision be made based on the opinions of the two reviewers? I have submitted to three reviewers and all have accepted the review. One review has been completed in half a month. I don't know when it will be finalized.

(0) Thank | 中了毕业

Bro, usually this journal makes decisions based on the opinions of several reviewers. I submitted it for review on December 30th, and three reviewers accepted it. One of them finished the review on the 13th. Will there be another review before a decision is made? The review process seems to be quite fast.

(0) Thank | 中了毕业

Brothers, this journal has invited three reviewers and all three have agreed to review. What is the minimum number of reviewers' opinions required to make a decision? One expert has already completed the external review in two weeks. How long will it take to complete the external review, is one month enough? Waiting to graduate.

(0) Thank | 中了毕业

The system has encountered a problem.
11.22 Resubmitted.
11.25 Already received.
The editor is very responsible and processes quickly.

(0) Thank | 小狼

7.10 submission
9.3 revision accepted provided changes are made
9.10 second review finished changed to withdrawn
Emailed the editor, 9.17 editor retracted decision, now in revisions being processed
9.25 changed back to withdrawn
Sent multiple emails to the editor afterwards, no response, status unchanged
Still no response, changed to withdrawn without us actively withdrawing the submission, unsure why, no explanation given
Any brothers encountered the same situation?

(0) Thank | 小狼

With dip, two days, can I still send it?

(0) Thank | ZW_WWS

Gone, right? Is the decision in process gone as well?

(0) Thank | ZW_WWS

Have you figured it out?

(0) Thank | ZW_WWS

Is it expensive?

(0) Thank | ZW_WWS

Decision in process
Submitted two days ago, changed to Decision in process
It's been two days, is it likely to be rejected? If the status doesn't change after Halloween on Tuesday, should I start looking for other journals?

(1) Thank | ZW_WWS

A good journal to keep track of.

(0) Thank | ZhihaoYan

Hello, I would like to ask which editor handled this.

(0) Thank | Aaaaaaccept

I would like to ask if there is a situation in CMAME where two sets of review opinions are used to make decisions.

(0) Thank | Aaaaaaccept

Machine learning has severely contaminated the computational methods.

(1) Thank | yyy_cccc

May I ask how many articles have been numbered so far?

(0) Thank | 小杨咩咩

Jul 14 2024 Submitted to journal
Jul 15 2024 With Editor

(0) Thank | Stevens