Composites Science and Technology; Editor-in-Chief: Karl Schulte; 07/Jan/2020: Submitted; 10/Jan/2020: Under Review; 10/Feb/2020: Ready for Decision; 11/Feb/2020: Major Revision; 09/Apr/2020: Revision Submit; 10/Apr/2020: With Editor; 13/Apr/2020: Under Review; 29/Apr/2020: Ready for Decision; 03/May/2020: Minor Revision; 06/May/2020: Revision Submit; 06/May/2020: With Editor; 08/May/2020: Accept.

(5) Thank | Stephen_He

It was my first article during my undergraduate period. The research direction was nanomaterials to enhance traditional fiber / resin composites. After finishing the writing, it was firstly sent to Part B, but it was rejected without review and reasons (a domestic associate editor). It was transferred to Composites Science and Technology after revising and polishing on July 23, 2019. It was handled by professor Mai. After 3 months of under review, I urged it and the editor replied that 8 reviewers refused to review it, and he prepared to find another 4 experts. One month later, it was under review on December 15, and major revision was required in the letter, along with 32 comments. 2 months was given for revision. The revision was submitted on February 9, 2020, and it was with editor in two days, and under review on the same day. It was ready for decision in 28 days, and accepted today. It took nearly 8 months, and the review comments were professional. The editor was responsible, and processing speed was fast, who lived up to the reputation of Composites Science and Technology in the industry.

(11) Thank | Mr. Bob

The review speed is very fast, and the manuscript processing efficiency is high. I would like to thank editor Zhang very much here. The following is the submission process, for your reference: 2019.5.31 Submission; 2019.6.02 Under review; 2019.7.01 Ready for decision; 2019.7.10 Revision requested; 2019.7.17 Resubmission; 2019.7.21 Accept; 2019.7.22 Online.

(14) Thank | FDR225757

I submitted to this journal even though I heard that the journal was slow to review. My paper was accepted after 4 months, which included two rounds of revisions and the holiday season. There were a total of four reviewers for my manuscript. In general, I had a pleasant submission experience despite a few tangles in the middle.

(4) Thank | 宏博

How is it going? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | duoduo0315

District 2.

(0) Thank | Gzq1

Any news? Has it been downgraded?

(0) Thank | hw

District 2 is finished.

(0) Thank | Kinglle

Accepted, quite fast speed.

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻LR

Professor Zhang, rest in peace on your journey!!

(0) Thank | MPCM energy

Still the same, unchanged, whether to rush or not is all the same.

(0) Thank | hahahahhahahah

How are you doing?

(0) Thank | 12ee3

How are you doing?

(0) Thank | 12ee3

Everyone is feeling anxious about whether their submission has been rejected or is still under review for a long time.

(0) Thank | hw

How is Professor Marino M. Quaresimin's editing process? Is it fast?

(0) Thank | 12ee3

After resubmission for revision, the system does not display it, I don't know if it's because I am not the corresponding author.

(0) Thank | Ballack_Z

Reminders are useless, still waiting.

(0) Thank | hahahahhahahah

Just submitted to this journal, it's been a week and still waiting to hear back from the editor. Feeling nervous. This editor is such an idiot.

(0) Thank | 泛泛

How did you solve it? My situation is similar.

(0) Thank | 12ee3

I have been waiting for the editor for a super long time, almost 50 days now. This journal is so stupid.

(0) Thank | hahahahhahahah

He should be the third reviewer, he is waiting.

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻LR

The editor said, "I'm not sure what the situation is with the modeling part."

(0) Thank | hw

12.13 under review (submitted to 4 reviewers, 2 accepted)
01.10 RRC
02.10 Still in RRC. Has anyone encountered this situation before, where opinions were urged once during the RRC period? It's really tormenting.

(0) Thank | kaier546

Extremely slow

(0) Thank | hahahahhahahah

1.22 in the early morning. A major revision was completed without any difficulties. All three reviewers requested references, so I believe yours will be done soon as well. The first two reviewers provided feedback within a week, but the third reviewer has not responded yet, so the process is currently on hold. It should have been submitted last night, and I was informed this morning that a major revision is required.

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻LR