19.10.29-submit; 19.10.31-with editor. It was assigned to editor Romain Bordes; 19.11.4-under review; 20.4.24-review comments returned. There was only one reviewer, and the editor explained that the review cycle was delayed because other reviewers refused to review. The reviewer comments are very moderate, with only a few small problems in the format and a small experiment that needs to be supplemented. A minor revision was required and the editor gave 21 days for revision. Because of the epidemic, I couldn't return to school to make up the experiment, so I applied an extension of 2 weeks. 5.24-resubmit; 5.26-accept. Although the review cycle is relatively long, it is still very smooth. I was also busy with other things in the middle and there was no reminder received. The editors and reviewers are great, and it has been categorized to Q2 in 2020. I’m so happy.

(3) Thank | 卜楞喵喵

Jan 1, submitted; Jan 2, with editor; Jan 9, under review; Jan 14, under review; Jan 31, revision; Feb 20, revision submitted; Feb 22, under review; Mar 8, reviewer requested completed; Mar 12, reviewer requested completed; Mar 17, accept. It was the last article before the graduation of master. Thank you, editor R. Bordes!

(5) Thank | Biu

2018.12.7 submitted; 2018.12.8 under review; 2019.02.19 revision; 2019.03.7 revision submitted; 2019.03.7 accepted. The manuscript was under review the next day after submission, but the reviewer delayed for more than two months, I submitted the revision at noon, and it was accepted in the afternoon. I am very grateful to the editor, Professor Franz Grieser, for his high efficiency. The comments of the two reviewers were not a big problem. A test chart was added, and the others were all minor mistakes in language and pictures. Overall, it was easy to solve. It depends on the efficiency of the reviewers. The efficiency of the editor is fast. THUMBS UP！

(2) Thank | 9渣8渣5硕

I submitted my manuscript in April and received the review comments in May. One reviewer wanted a minor repair and the other wanted an overhaul. Total of 24 questions. When I saw that, I struggled between changing the paper and giving up. Later, I had to write a letter to the editor and ask for an extension of 2 weeks. The editor was very kind and agreed to my extension, but I still had to really struggle to get the revised paper in on time. I uploaded the manuscript of the overhaul just before the final deadline and the editor gave me good news after 3 days, directly accepting it.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

You are not talking nonsense, isn't this the normal process?

(0) Thank | msq.

I have been with the editor for half a month, but there has been no submission or rejection yet, and the selected editor is blank.

(0) Thank | Francis

Classmate, there is no corresponding editor for the revised manuscript. What should we do about this? It's quite urgent.

(0) Thank | sidhajsfgauf

Classmate, there is no corresponding editor for the revised manuscript. What should we do?

(0) Thank | sidhajsfgauf

Mine too, it has been 10 days and it is still pending.

(0) Thank | 吃嗯陈

This was transferred from another journal, and the scientific editor who received it promised it would immediately enter peer review. However, it has been a long time already. What should we do, my friends? TAT

(0) Thank | 壁古天蓝

3.4 submission, 3.9 with editor has changed slightly, 3.17 still with.

(0) Thank | 猪在海中游

Could you please tell me how long it takes to work with Editor?

(0) Thank | cactuses

+1, it's been 10 days since rrc, not much movement, is everyone like this?

(0) Thank | 庆++

It has been ten days since contacting RRC, but there has been no response yet. It feels a bit slow, and I am also afraid to rush them.

(0) Thank | yesjam

Can I ask everyone if the review process has been fast recently? My RRC status has been for two weeks now, and all the reviewer comments have been returned, but it hasn't been processed yet.

(0) Thank | 摸鱼划水的传热人

Has it been submitted for review? How long until it can be submitted for review?

(0) Thank | swqsqws

Same question, how do you choose when there is no initial review processing editor during rework?

(0) Thank | 冬冬

Hello, I wanted to ask if you have received any results from your submission? I also selected the option for a blank editor when submitting, and my status has been "with editor" ever since.

(0) Thank | yuyu

Submitted on November 25, 2024
Major revision on January 6, 2025
Revised on January 23, 2025
Review process completed on February 5, 2025
Accepted on February 10, 2025

After submission, it coincided with Christmas, the major revision was mainly due to the fact that the results of the pre-holiday testing samples were not available, so it is best not to rush the revision during the holidays, as the test results may not be available. After the revision, it coincided with the Spring Festival, and results were quickly available after the resumption of work after the Spring Festival. The journal's speed is still very fast, and I wish it continued to improve.

(0) Thank | Mky.

The first review process took over two months, which is already considered very slow compared to other articles in the journal. The first review resulted in a request for revisions, but it is unclear whether they are major or minor revisions. The revised manuscript is expected to be returned in around 10 days, with acceptance within a week.

(0) Thank | paperplusplus

Submitted on December 23, 2024
Sent for review on December 25, 2024
Major revisions on January 8, 2025
Submitted revised manuscript on January 17, 2025
Sent for review on January 21, 2025
Second major revisions on January 24, 2025, with one reviewer insisting on further modifications
Submitted revised manuscript on January 27, 2025
Accepted on January 27, 2025
From submission to acceptance, it took a total of one month, which is quite fast. If it weren't for the second round of revisions, it probably would have been accepted in less than a month.
The annual publication volume is over 2400 articles, with an instantaneous impact factor of 4.95. The impact factor after 25 years is expected to be around 5.65.
Overall, this journal is very good. I wish it continued success.

(0) Thank | LabXu

The journal We has been running smoothly for almost a month.

(0) Thank | 小全同学

Experience of submitting a manuscript:
Oct 29, 2024 Submitted to Journal;
Oct 30, 2024 With Editor;
Nov 01, 2024 With Editor;
Nov 27, 2024 Under Review;
Nov 29, 2024 Under Review;
Dec 01, 2024 Under Review;
Jan 07, 2025 Revise;
Jan 13, 2025 With Editor;
Jan 14, 2025 With Editor;
Jan 17, 2025 Under Review;
Jan 24, 2025 Accept;
Thank you Professor baishuo and Professor lijunbai, after being rejected four or five times, the article has finally been submitted, wishing your journal better and better!

(0) Thank | 小全同学

We have been the same, while the dates change.

(0) Thank | 韩服天堂

I vote on the 8th, "we" on the 9th, the date changed to the 11th, still on "we" now, have you updated yours?

(0) Thank | hhss