It took about ten days for the editor to process the manuscript after submission. The first review was slow, and the review took more than 100 days. The review comments were friendly. After the submission of the revised manuscript, it took about 20 days for the process of the editor and second review. However, one reviewer was not very satisfied with the answer, and one more revision was required. Three days after (the submission of) the revision, it was accepted.

(2) Thank | 卢子凰

The review speed was slow. It took 3 months for both first review and second review. The advantage was that as long as you urged it, the news would be given. It was accepted after two revisions. Basic research articles can be accepted, but the research must have clinical value. The reviewers were relatively professional and asked a lot of questions.

(3) Thank | yjm1979

Hello, may I ask if you have found where to view the submission status?

(0) Thank | 科研shan

Hello, may I ask where to check the status of the manuscript?

(0) Thank | 科研shan

Hello, may I ask where can I check the status of my submission after I have submitted it?

(0) Thank | 科研shan

Have you found where to check the status of the article?

(0) Thank | ZXL.

Do you know how to check the status of the manuscript?

(0) Thank | Jin

Please tell me how to check the progress of the review. What kind of crappy system is this?

(0) Thank | Sou1柔情

May I ask how to check the progress of the manuscript?

(0) Thank | 赫啦啦

May I ask how to check the progress of the manuscript? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 赫啦啦

Dear experts, I just submitted an article, I selected "I am a contributor" instead of "I am a correspondent." However, after reaching the final step of preview & confirm, I couldn't find any record of the submission, and I didn't receive any email notification. Can anyone provide some guidance on this issue?

(0) Thank | RLZ

How did it go later on?

(0) Thank | 如来伟懋

Generally, between 4-10 weeks, the quality of the manuscript should still be relatively high.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

How about the review period?

(0) Thank | 百花婷婷

Just finished the game.

(0) Thank | 百花婷婷

This situation is indeed a bit strange. The first status indicates rejection, followed by peer review. It may be a problem with the system status. You can contact the editorial department.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

What does "manuscript rejected" followed by "in review" mean? Does it mean rejection and should I withdraw the submission and send it to another journal?

(0) Thank | 洗髓梓睿

I'm not sure

(0) Thank | 水竹小公主

No need to change the title, follow the instructions to complete the experiment and resubmit

(0) Thank | 水竹小公主

Research Focus: Tumor Experience Sharing: Can kick about every four months

(0) Thank | 傲桃mio

I think it's not bad. I was rejected instantly when I submitted it for the first time, but fortunately I was given the reason for rejection. When I looked at the reason for rejection, it was not valid, the editor just didn't read my article carefully. So I made some changes to the article, submitted it again, and explained the editor's doubts. The editor helped me send it for external review. Two months later, I received suggestions for major revisions, but in fact there were only a few simple issues, and suggested that I do some additional experiments. I did not make the additional experiments, but explained the reasons and opinions why I did not do the experiments. I submitted it again and it was accepted directly. Ah, I'm really happy

(3) Thank | 盛夏了夏

Hello, may I ask if you accept articles with only clinical specimens?

(0) Thank | 排云一然

How about the following article?

(0) Thank | 墟散若曦

How to resubmit after being rejected? Do I need to change the manuscript title?

(0) Thank | Muriel Sapir

Can I resubmit after being rejected? Do I need to change the title?

(0) Thank | Muriel Sapir