July 14, 2020, Submitted Journal; July 24, 2020, With Editor; August 4, 2020, Under Review; September 2, 2020, Update status; September 9, 2020, Update status; September 12, 2020, Revise: Major Revision; September 22, 2020, Revision Submitted to Journal; October 1, 2020, With Editor; October 2, 2020, Under Review; October 29, 2020, Update status; November 1, 2020, Update status; November 9, 2020, Revise: Minor Revision; November 9, 2020, Revision Submitted to Journal; November 10, 2020, Sent to Author; November 10, 2020, Revision Submitted to Journal; November 11, 2020, With Editor; November 15, 2020, Accepted.

(2) Thank | 海风吹向你

Three reviewers, one required a major revision, and two required minor revisions. After the revision, the editor let us revise the abbreviations in the abstract and then accepted it. Submitted on July 14 and accepted on November 15.

(0) Thank | 海风吹向你

If you only care about the impact factor, it is not high for the JGR-Atmosphere. But the IF trend is not everything.

(9) Thank | earthresearch

First review took two months and asked for two major repairs but with few opinions offered. Paper seriously revised after another two months and returned to reviewers, another minor repair asked for immediately. Repair made and paper returned to journal, paper then accepted for online publication. Entire process took 6 months.

(3) Thank | climate

24.12.09 submitted
24.12.10 under review
25.3.23 minor revision
The editor is really good, works efficiently, and is very responsible!

(0) Thank | goodideas

2024.12.16 Major Revision
2025.1.7 submitted
2025.2.27 Accepted

(0) Thank | studentk

Have you heard any news yet? The project I invested in at the end of July is still under review.

(0) Thank | tango

2024.07.06 提交
2024.07.15 我们
2024.07.19 你的

(0) Thank | studentk

Using the Springer-Nature submission system, but recently it seems like they have switched back to using EM for submissions. This information is for reference only.
The first review took approximately 4 months, and after receiving the review comments, the given time for revisions was 14 days. Personally, I extended it by 7 days.
After the second review, it was accepted after 2 months.

(0) Thank | rdeng97

How long after being hired will I be online?

(0) Thank | 小熊1998

Feels faster than before. New Springer-Nature submission system. The peer review process is fairer. Accepted quickly. Feels pretty good.

(42) Thank | Rainy~

Top journal in the field of atmospheric science and climate change, it was accepted after one month of submission with feedback. There were five reviewers, major revisions were required, followed by three minor revisions from colleagues and two major revisions. After another round of minor revisions, it was successfully accepted. This article can be considered a representative work for me.

(15) Thank | Mike1982

Although the review is slower, I feel that the editors and reviewers are responsible.Seriously, after two major overhauls, I received it.Therefore, the length of the journal review cycle does not have a very precise time. Everyone's situation is different. In short, they cannot be anxious.

(0) Thank | 没雄鹰

Modified 2 times, once overhauled a minor repair, but the comments are more convenient to answer.It takes about 1 month to respond each time.Online is very fast, but the page number seems to be very slow.

(1) Thank | ve

Reviewing speed is very fast, directly return online after returning

(1) Thank | dd

地学一区,TopJournal

(0) Thank | Anonymous