It has been one months after submission, but there isn’t any news. What the hell!

(2) Thank | 生态水文弱鸡

Very good~ The editor is very responsible~ Impact factor needs to be further improved~ Come on, SCI journal in China~

(0) Thank | 石头6

It is just very slow.

(0) Thank | 给你吃颗糖

This journal's peer review process involves evaluation by the editorial team first, followed by evaluation by the actual reviewers, which is a strange practice.

(0) Thank | Upppp123

Submitted on November 18th, the manuscript has been in a blank state since the peer review was completed on December 11th. Can any colleagues who have encountered this issue before provide me with an explanation? Thank you very much.

(0) Thank | keyan0000

The paper submitted in 23 years will be accepted by the end of 24 years, but it is still unknown when it will be published. The process is really slow, but the feedback is very professional. The quality of the article has indeed improved after revisions, and the editor is very responsible, willing to go through multiple rounds of proofreading with you. The process is painful, but the acceptance is always satisfying.

(0) Thank | DXX

Hello, can we exchange contact information for better communication about the progress?

(0) Thank | Linda11

Hello! After entering Peer Review, the actual completion time was displayed, but the status became blank. Have you encountered this situation before?

(0) Thank | wang125

After more than a month, I thought the peer review was over, but it turned out that the further review afterwards was the real review.

(1) Thank | Upppp123

Hello, may I ask if the system shows that Peer Review is for internal or external review?

(0) Thank | wang125

I entered the external audit on July 1st and it was expected to end on July 15th, but now it's already August.

(0) Thank | Upppp123

The manuscript received on May 27th has been under external review for a long time.

(0) Thank | 给你吃颗糖

The submission was received on June 11th, but we haven't received any results yet. How about you?

(0) Thank | Upppp123

No results yet, any updates? How long does the external audit take?

(0) Thank | 给你吃颗糖

Already promoted to Level 2

(0) Thank | xiaoyu247

Submission date: 20230510
As of 20231106, no feedback on the review has been received.
Don't submit, it's too slow, why bother with so many non-submissions in Tier 3?

(0) Thank | Ammo

Submitted for review, rejected after two weeks, no feedback given. I give up

(0) Thank | peike

External audit for a month with no feedback from the editor, just rejection. At least provide some feedback

(0) Thank | wsxm

Hello, could I add you on WeChat to communicate?

(0) Thank | geochemical gui

It has been reduced and thrown again. Hope to win, and if I win, I will fulfill my wish!

(0) Thank | 小敏吖

Submitted on June 3rd, asked to revise and resubmit on July 3rd. I want to ask if anyone has a similar situation as mine. I'm seeking help to know how everyone checks and revises their English articles for plagiarism. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

(1) Thank | 小敏吖

The current journal official website shows two publishing methods: traditional non-open source or open source, and is undergoing a transformation towards a completely open-source journal. If I choose the non-open source option, how long does it take to retrieve the required information?

(0) Thank | 我要毕业啊啊啊

The official website states that there are two publishing methods to choose from, whether to keep it open-source or not. However, it is unknown whether not being open-source will make it slower.

(0) Thank | 我要毕业啊啊啊

The speed is too slow. It took 8-9 months to receive the revised opinions. I had to urge them many times throughout the process. Finally, I accepted it, but I am amazed at this speed.

(2) Thank | 1221

Yes, me too. I've been waiting all this time. Originally, there should have been a response by the end of last year.

(0) Thank | JosephD