Although it was accepted after a lot of hard work, it is hard to tell good articles from bad, there are good articles and a lot of valueless articles as well. There is still a big gap between this journal and Clinical Cancer Research.

(25) Thank | gogopublish

After nine months, the first article was accepted by CCC. I feel that CCC's processing speed is not bad, not as long as at least a year I heard. Except for it was quite long for the two months with editor, it was quite fast. The editor sent it to the reviewers the next day after major revision and minor revision submitted. It is a very good journal. I hope CCC will do better in the future.

(29) Thank | 快乐科研狗1111

Recently, the review speed has become significantly faster. Good articles are suggested to try. This is a journal higher having a higher level of recognition than CBM.

(8) Thank | CCRCCCCBM

This is probably my first and last submission to CCC. I submitted back in August, and the status of my article is still with the editor in November. Although I’ve emailed the editor twice, his response is that it’s the journal’s policy to only use experts in the field, and that everyone is currently unavailable. Slow – reconsider submitting to this journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Can any expert interpret how long it takes for CCC's "Require Reviews Complete"? Four review comments have come back, three of them, but one reviewer has been silent for over a month, probably slipped away.

(0) Thank | Manhattan

Hey everyone, I wanted to ask if four of the opinions have received 3 opinions, and the other person is likely to have left. RRC has been over three weeks, should we send it out?

(0) Thank | Manhattan

The quality of this journal has been declining since the editor was changed a few years ago. It has become a tool for a group of influential people to manipulate. The journal now prioritizes papers with a large quantity of work, but may overlook those with truly innovative ideas and strategies.

(0) Thank | SHMSFHMHMHM

May I ask if anyone knows how long it usually takes for editors at CCC to provide feedback on manuscript submissions?

(0) Thank | 西破儿

The first submission was made, skipping the "submitted to journal" status and going directly to "with editor." Three days later, the status changed to "with editor." Has the chief editor passed this on to other editors?

(0) Thank | 哦，你是大佬

Nemkumar Banthia was also rejected by this editor.

(0) Thank | mhbby

May I ask how to find out who the editor of an article is? Can it be seen during the "with editor" stage?

(0) Thank | mhbby

Oh, CCR is pretty much a lost cause again, so CBM is the one with some high-quality articles. I guess it's because the editor rejected them.

(1) Thank | 不愿意透露姓名的草根科研者

It's not that he doesn't want Chinese people, he has quite a few articles published under the name of Chinese people. He only attaches his name to those that are related to him, even articles written by Koreans are published under his name.

(0) Thank | 不愿意透露姓名的草根科研者

The current editor-in-chief of CCC is **, Nemkumar Banthia. This ** is of low level. I feel that it is because **, an Indian, does not want articles from Chinese people.

(0) Thank | 印度人都得*

It's edited by Nemkumar, who looks like an Indian. You can search for his articles. Many submissions in China, especially top journals like CCC, have to mention his name. Those who understand the reasons will know.

(0) Thank | 不愿意透露姓名的草根科研者

Which editor is it?

(0) Thank | 1111阿龙

The most disgusting editor I have ever seen, the nano-modification method we are researching has not been studied in concrete yet, but he directly said, as everyone knows, it does not solve scientific problems. Yesterday, I listened to an academic report he gave, and then checked the literature, all about uhpc steel fiber modification, he himself made a lot of ccc, all just a routine, and still had the nerve to deny that it is well-known. A search on Baidu shows that every year he goes to lectures at top universities in China, I don't know how much he has gained.

(2) Thank | 不愿意透露姓名的草根科研者

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 1

(1) Thank | 周亿

Encountered, it should be a system issue, does not affect.

(0) Thank | pangpang

0705-Submitted to journal
0706-With editor (Narayanan Neithalath PhD)
0713-Under review
0729-Major revision (Deadline 0828)
0825-Revision submitted to journal
0825-With editor (Nemkumar Banthia)
1001-Under review
1010-Required reviews completed
1024-Accepted

(0) Thank | pangpang

How did your paper turn out in the end?

(0) Thank | 星煌

What's going on with this issue? Some people say it will be accepted and online in 2 months. Others say it's still with the editor after 2 months. Is the difference so big?

(0) Thank | King_of_accept

I have been in editing for 2 months and still have not submitted for review.

(1) Thank | 云间02

This is my first submission to this journal, and it took two and a half months for my submission to be accepted.

(0) Thank | 冲吧阿亮

2024.7.14 submitted to journal
2024.7.16 with editor
2024.7.23 under review
2024.8.8  Seven reviewers, over seventy review comments, result in major revisions
2024.9.6   Revised version resubmitted
2024.9.29 Accepted
It was the second submission to this journal, the first submission was rejected and transferred to CBM, it was indeed difficult, but given one month for major revisions, and also added a bunch of experiments, fortunately the results were acceptable.

(0) Thank | 日新 刘