The review speed was not fast. It took more than a month for the first review, and about 40 days for the submission of revision. It has been almost 20 days without results since the submission of revision.

(4) Thank | 绿色驰骋

The journal review speed is very fast, and the comments given by the reviewers are also very detailed and pertinent.

(4) Thank | 可乐~

ScholarOne Manuscripts. (formerly Manuscript Central) January 11, 2013 21:00 Completion of submission status EO: Not Assigned Awaiting Editorial office Processing

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Rejected within a week...very fast indeed...

(0) Thank | 马思壮

11.4 awaiting editor assignment
11.5 under review

Is it under external review? Or is it undergoing internal editor review?

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

How long does it generally take for "Awaiting Admin Processing"?

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

10.30 Awaiting Admin Processing. I don't know how long this status will last.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

After two weeks of the second review, the editor provided 2 minor suggestions. After making the revisions, there was no news for another month. Frustrated.

(0) Thank | Ethel Clapham

The first review took 3 months. There were opinions from 7 reviewers. It has been revised accordingly.

(0) Thank | Ethel Clapham

How are you doing now, buddy?

(0) Thank | 先天邦安

After you submit the manuscript, you will receive an email with a link that will take you to the old submission system.

(0) Thank | 筑阳妮娜

Hello, may I ask if "Under Review" means it is under external review? It has been almost a month since submission, thank you.

(0) Thank | 打狗白筠

Where did you find the old system? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 打狗白筠

May I ask how long your second trial will be? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 筑阳妮娜

Can you please share your submission status timeline? How long does the second review take? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 筑阳妮娜

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: Metabolism; Stem cells; Regeneration
Experience sharing: A very good journal! The editors and reviewers are very responsible, and the review process is fast. Highly recommended.

(0) Thank | 长安慕雁

How is the current status of the answerer? I also submitted my work and it is currently under review, it has been almost two months now.

(0) Thank | jiwang11

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research directions: stem cells; regeneration; development
Experience sharing: Short submission cycle, professional opinions from editors and reviewers. A shining example of domestic journals!

(0) Thank | 心意运发

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: stem cells; regeneration; development
Experience sharing: Fast review speed, and the opinions given by editors and reviewers are very professional. A shining star among domestic journals!

(0) Thank | 心意运发

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Focused research areas: tumors; single cells; organoids
Experience sharing: Overall, the submission process was quite challenging, with many experiments needing revision. However, fortunately, I finally received good results!

(0) Thank | 太山碧露

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research directions: tumors; pseudo-organs; metabolism Experience sharing: Just received a submission, feeling that the editors and reviewers are quite professional. Some black spots were rejected, feeling a bit unfair in the heart.

(0) Thank | 弹腿听寒

Generally, internal editors will review first, and only after that will peer review take place. This process takes a relatively long time, so please pay attention to the status of your submission.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

"Under review" means in the process of peer review for a manuscript.

(0) Thank | Bruno Shakespeare

It's better to be rejected instantly than to be dragged on for two weeks before being rejected. Graduates can't afford to be delayed.

(0) Thank | 弹腿听寒

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: Drug delivery
Experience sharing: The efficiency is quite high. It only took a little over two months to receive minor revisions. One reviewer was a bit challenging and requested several additions. The editor's responses were very professional and prompt, and they also provided some good suggestions.

(0) Thank | Deirdre MacArthur