After five months of preliminary review, the manuscript was rejected and resubmitted. However, it was quite easy to revise according to the review comments. I have already done it in the early stage, but this part of the content was not added. The revision and replies written exceeded 15 pages, and the revision comments of the editors and reviewers were answered earnestly. Resubmission after a total of 20 days of modification. Then the second trial was conducted for two months and was directly hired. Generally speaking, the editor is very responsible and the reviewers are also very friendly. I recommend everyone to submit to this journal.

(0) Thank | 啊呀切

The content of my paper is about common catalyst. The manuscript was submitted on July 2 and was sent for review the next day. The reviewer's comments received on August 15 were very pertinent. They gave a very practical suggestion and we revised it according to the reviewer's request. Revision submitted on September 5 and it was directly accepted on October 3. It took just three months and the speed was not bad. I hope the journal will get better and better!

(17) Thank | wysspz

2.22 Submission; 5.5 major revision; 5. 24 revised submission; 6.6 accept; 6.12 online. It was the third article during my graduate student period. It was a very good journal in the field of catalysis. Reviewer’s questions and suggestions were very helpful to improve the quality of the article.

(400) Thank | DH

Catalysis Letters has a fast review process; the slowest experience I’ve had has been about 6 weeks. I frequently submit to this journal – I think I’ve submitted around 10 manuscripts by now. All but one have been accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Five days for technical review, one day for editor to invite reviewers. The first reviewer responded quickly, but it has been half a month and there is still no response from the second reviewer, and we are all about to graduate.

(0) Thank | 惟挚

I would like to ask, it has been 18 days since the manuscript was in the hands of the editor, is it normal that there has been no peer review yet? I am worried that I won't graduate on time.

(0) Thank | 六六顺利毕业版

How long does the technical review generally take?

(0) Thank | 周周ZDX

Can invest

(0) Thank | 一头牛

Are only invited individuals allowed to submit contributions?

(0) Thank | Z9

Submission on December 5, 2024,
December 10, with editor
December 10, peer review
December 17, revisions
December 24, returned
Resubmission on December 27
Accepted on January 4, 2025

(0) Thank | 一头牛

8.22 submitted for review
10.15 review completed, comments: major revisions
10.28 submitted revised draft
11.22 review completed
11.25 decision to accept

(0) Thank | 变

11.19 acceptance

(0) Thank | tyytytyt

11.5 Overhaul

(0) Thank | tyytytyt

20241018 still in ur

(0) Thank | tyytytyt

Under Review on 2024.10.03

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈啧啧啧

2024.10.02 Awaiting Admin Processing

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈啧啧啧

Submit by September 24, 2024.

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈啧啧啧

9.11 submission
9.16 under review
Good luck!

(0) Thank | tyytytyt

8.5 minor repair, return on the same day, and accept on 8.7

(0) Thank | 一头牛

8.5 minor adjustments again, return, accepted on 8.7

(0) Thank | 一头牛

6.10 Submission
6.16 Major revision
6.23 Minor revision
7.15 Final revision

(0) Thank | 一头牛

4.29 online

(0) Thank | 一头牛

2024.3.3 submission
3.4 review
3.13 major revision
3.21 return, 4.9 minor revision
4.11 return
4.15 language polishing needed
4.16 return, 4.22 acceptance
4.27 proofreading

(0) Thank | 一头牛

Excuse me, it's been two weeks and there is still no news from the editor-in-chief. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | Apple311

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive the proof email of the publishing agreement after accepting it?

(0) Thank | 1za5q9