The comments returned in half a month. The efficiency is very fast. Although it was not accepted in the end, the reviewers made a lot of pertinent opinions, which were pretty good.

(0) Thank | jo仔

Submitted on April 19th, under review on April 21st, and review comments returned on May 4th. Although it was not accepted, they raised1 many pertinent opinions. Fast speed, high efficiency, awesome!

(0) Thank | jo仔

How is your progress now? How long has it been under review?

(0) Thank | 重阳庆庆

Under review on the same day, hopefully I can pass

(0) Thank | 北海玉军

I need to be available at all times

(0) Thank | 风啸友安

Do you need the original data for this?

(0) Thank | 寂灭恒鑫

The review speed is relatively fast, and the feedback is quite objective. It took about 5 months to complete this article

(0) Thank | 风啸友安

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submitted on June 18, 2022 Sent for external review on June 21, 2022 First review comments on July 21, 2022 First revision on September 8, 2022 External review on September 14, 2022 Minor revisions + preliminary acceptance on October 6, 2022 Second revision on October 11, 2022 External review on October 21, 2022 Officially accepted on October 21, 2022 Editor is very friendly Page fee = Base fee 900 + Figure 250*6 + Open publication fee 2300 = $4700 USD, if you do not want to publish openly, you can save $2300

(0) Thank | 风啸友安

By summarizing the research subject, materials sources, methods, and techniques used, the reader can understand how this study was conducted. Therefore, the abstract must describe the methods used

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Differences between HIGHLIGHTS and abstracts: composed of several key words, not necessarily complete sentences; more concise and shorter in length; HIGHLIGHTS only contain important findings, while abstracts include research objectives and research methods

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the difference between abstract and highlights?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

Does the abstract need to describe the methods used?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

Review speed: 1.0
Experience sharing: The review comments were returned in half a month, very efficient. Although the paper was not accepted in the end, a lot of constructive feedback was provided. Pretty good

(0) Thank | 天山凡霜

Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted on April 19th, under review on April 21st, and received feedback on May 4th. Although not accepted, received many constructive comments. Fast speed, high efficiency, highly recommended

(0) Thank | 碧桃逸致

How long does the first review take?

(0) Thank | 郭云桑

Doesn't anyone pay attention to this magazine? This magazine is under AACR and is actually very good

(0) Thank | 重阳文景

The journal of oncology belongs to a relatively good journal, and the feedback from the reviewers is also very detailed

(0) Thank | 平原梓云

The oncology journal is still quite good.The journals and reviewers gave me very detailed comments.

(0) Thank | Barbee

Submitted an article on Chinese herbal medicine anti-tumor and quickly accepted! No additional experiments were required

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁