This journal is decent, and I would submit another research article. The reviewers provided pertinent comments and edits and raised some important questions that I hadn’t adequately discussed. The reviewers were also very helpful with any language issues, which I was grateful for. I must admit that writing is not my best skill.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

How long does it take to be published?

(0) Thank | kekeT

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Focus on research direction: Prognostic indicators; Experience sharing on liver cancer prognosis: 2023.3.18 submission---under review 2023.4.21 major revisions 8 | minor revisions 3 (pure clinical research, although there are many problems, they are all relatively easy to answer, did not require me to add data) 2023.5.08 resubmission---under review 2023.5.23 under review---process in decision 2023.5.28 acceptance

(0) Thank | 格洛丽亚瑞林

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Emphasized research direction: tumor
Experience sharing: It is a very slow journal, with a turnaround time of 8 months to 1 year

(0) Thank | 英洁可爱吗

So slow, it has been under review for a week. Is it too urgent to withdraw the submission now? #slowreview#

(0) Thank | 降龙涵梅

I remember it was generated immediately

(0) Thank | Jill Will

How long does it take to assign a number to the submitted manuscript?

(0) Thank | Brady Whit

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Sharing of experience: strongly discourage, 9 months for review, should have 1 rejection and 2 major revisions in the review comments, editor rejected after 1 month with very unprofessional reasons

(0) Thank | 袈裟莉霞

I was accepted, it took nearly 4 months in total

(0) Thank | Jill Will

How is your article coming along?

(0) Thank | 削月连胜

I have updated my schedule four times as well

(0) Thank | 削月连胜

I am already three months old

(0) Thank | Zachary DuBois

It's been 2 months, but it's still the same, only time is passing by

(0) Thank | Jill Will

Research focus: Tumor biomarkers
Experience sharing: After submitting for nearly a month, the current status is "under review." What does that mean?

(0) Thank | 灵犀颖萓

How are things now?

(0) Thank | 削月连胜

HIGHLIGHTS is just one of the requirements that authors must provide for journals under Elsevier. Not all journals include HIGHLIGHTS. The information provided by HIGHLIGHTS can help readers decide whether to read the paper further more quickly than reading the abstract

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

1. The study found that regular exercise can significantly reduce the risk of heart disease.
2. Participants who exercised at least three times a week had a 30% lower risk of developing heart disease.
3. Exercise was also shown to improve overall cardiovascular health and decrease inflammation in the body

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the general requirements for the highlights section?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

When do we need the highlights section?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

My situation is the same

(0) Thank | 静晨酱吖

Have you placed a bet?

(0) Thank | Daniel Margaret

Review speed: 6.0 Emphasis on research direction: Tumor Experience sharing: It took more than 4 months from submission to receiving the first review comments, with four reviewers, two minor revisions and two major revisions. The result was a rejection, with the editor suggesting I resubmit after making the necessary changes

(0) Thank | 落英士魁

Research focus: Tumors
Experience sharing: Submitted after March 26th, minor revision on June 15th, major revision on June 26th, accepted on July 18th, feeling pretty good about it

(0) Thank | 北风鸿振

Can single gene bioinformatics without validation be submitted?

(0) Thank | 太枝mio

Review speed: 6.0
Emphasis on research direction: tumor
Sharing experience: The review took five months, and the opinions of three reviewers were all minor issues. However, it was unexpectedly rejected in the end. It is a rubbish journal. I suggest being cautious about submitting to it

(0) Thank | 志行可爱吗