It was rejected after submission and the reason was that it was not new enough. It took a week and was not sent for review. I think it’s not as easy as what others say.

(0) Thank | 2020年小可爱

First submission, first magazine. Submitted on April 30th, thinking of taking a break for Labor Day on May 1st. However, when I opened my computer on May 2nd, I found out that my submission on May 1st had already been rejected. The speed is really fast! They said it lacked innovation, maybe my level is not up to par.

(0) Thank | Lucky 1

Hello, can patients with osteoporosis participate in this study? Thank you

(0) Thank | 翠安小可爱

Overview of Accepting Invitations

(0) Thank | baobaoHAOCHI

Focused research direction: Osteoarthritis sharing: May I ask if original data is needed for this submission?

(0) Thank | 东京秋春

Not accepted, so not published

(0) Thank | 深渊玉巧

May I ask how long it takes for the post to be under review after the OP has submitted it?

(0) Thank | cyn123

Received confirmation email from the author, do all authors need to confirm?

(0) Thank | 醉曼超级甜

Do you have any experience with submitting a case? I just submitted a case to this magazine for the first time

(0) Thank | 北国安阳

Is Bone Reports included in SCI? No relevant information found

(0) Thank | 从雪mm

Hello, have you switched to Bone Reports? Is Bone Reports indexed by SCI? I didn't find any information about being indexed by SCI

(0) Thank | 从雪mm

Review speed: 1.0 Emphasis on research direction: Bone tissue research; Feels more clinical and animal experimental experience sharing: Submitted three times, directly rejected for language, revised and rejected again, finally asked to transfer to sister journal Bone Reports. In general, the journal has more professional reviewers, but nothing special about others, and the requirements are relatively high, articles from 4-5 years ago are not up to standard on content

(0) Thank | 深渊玉巧

As the level of specialization in disciplines increases, it becomes difficult for journals to find suitable peer review experts. Therefore, requesting authors to recommend reviewers is a mutually beneficial practice: journals can find suitable reviewers and save time looking for them, while authors can provide support through their contact networks and recommend scholars who can best understand the submitted manuscripts

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Recommendation by the supervisor or relevant personnel

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

I don't know any experts, can you still recommend someone?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

What is a recommended reviewer/expert/peer?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How do you invest in non-oa with bone?

(0) Thank | 书生水冬

Just received a review, the review process was very fast. The first review result was given within a month, with no request for additional experiments. However, the reviewer mentioned the issues very professionally and objectively, and gave three months to revise. After the revision, minor revisions were requested, and the paper was accepted the next day after the revision. The proof was made available online one day later. The journal overall has a fast speed, but it requires innovative articles. If discussing mechanisms, a deeper analysis is required.

(3) Thank | 欧尼su

What reason did they give? I was previously rejected by another magazine's editor because my submission didn't fit the publication's style after making some minor revisions

(0) Thank | 削月依彤

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 
Emphasized research directions: inflammation; extracellular matrix; osteoblast differentiation 
Experience sharing: The first reviewer raised a few simple questions, after revising, acceptance was received one week later

(0) Thank | 削月依彤

Research Focus: Bone Metabolism
Experience Sharing: Submitted on June 4th, one major revision and one minor revision, got rejected today, what a disappointment

(1) Thank | Joy Huxley

Congratulations, how difficult do you feel it is? I also just submitted one, studying mechanisms, and it was quite complete, with no animals involved

(0) Thank | Colin Faraday

Just got the review comments back. We went through three editors before it was finally submitted for review

(0) Thank | 北冥雪翎

How did it turn out in the end?

(0) Thank | Colin Faraday

After submitting the manuscript, it quickly went under review. After 20 days, it suddenly changed to "with editor." What does this mean?

(0) Thank | 北冥雪翎