The review speed was relatively slow. It had been 2 months, but it was still with the editor. Then he said my English is poor and rejected it.

(0) Thank | 想发文章的小廖

The editor is very serious. I think that the first reviewer seems to be the editor in the editorial department, who is very strict and serious.

(0) Thank | ziyuanhua66

This journal is surprisingly slow. Our manuscript is still with the editor two months after submission.

(1) Thank | JiANG.

This journal is surprisingly slow. It is still in the hands of the editor for two months after submission, and they do not send it for review at all. What a pain!

(2) Thank | JiANG.

Not collecting bibliometrics.

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

It's about 7 days, but it's not too fixed. I've also seen some people say they waited for a few weeks.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Hello, how many days does it usually take for him to edit this magazine?

(0) Thank | 星辰小娘子

Submitted in early May, the editor received it within a week. I thought BMC wouldn't be as slow as rumored, but it wasn't until the end of August that the review process began. It wasn't until mid-September that the first reviewer appeared. It looks like the rumors were true. I suspect that once the magazine took over, they forgot about it and only reluctantly sent it for review without directly rejecting it. Sigh.

(0) Thank | 筒学长

Friendly editing, submissions accepted until March 3rd.

(0) Thank | 应龙冰珍

Which direction, frontiers in neurology has accepted it

(0) Thank | 雾都宇轩

How did this journal, after finishing the technical review, go straight to peer review?

(0) Thank | 南川立轩

I really can't believe it. After waiting for 3 months for feedback from 4 reviewers, responding to each one, 2 months later reviewers 1 and 2 gave no issues, reviewer 3 suggested integrating the response content into the article, and reviewer 4 seemed to directly reject the paper. The editor asked for major revisions, and after adding experimental results and making revisions, it took another month to receive the rejection letter from reviewer 4, who used a rejection template out of nowhere, and even got the journal name wrong ([the Journal Name]). After over half a year of submission time, I really feel like crying

(1) Thank | 如影以菡

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: Ahhhhh

(0) Thank | 半月佑运

Submission success rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: healthy and happy

(0) Thank | 半月佑运

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 六合三诗

How long did you finally wait, is it the editor's decision or evaluation?

(0) Thank | 擒龙语寒

How much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | 东风歌阑

My submission was rejected behind me. I have revised it and resubmitted it, taking it seriously for the first time submitter. The revised manuscript has now been submitted to Frontiers in Neurology, and is currently under external review. Waiting for a response

(0) Thank | 是强圉吖

Submitted in mid-October of the 22nd year, stuck in "initial technical check" for a month and a half, and in early December, they notified me that it was "out of scope" and asked me to submit to another journal... If they had taken a few minutes to glance at it during this time, they wouldn't have wasted the author's time by only realizing it didn't belong to their journal after such a long period.

(1) Thank | Baytars

I was under review for about 50 days at that time, and then I waited for 4 months and was rejected because there were no reviewers

(0) Thank | Hobart Hobson

I have been feeling overwhelmed for over two months

(0) Thank | 仲夏宏峻

It has been over two months, and we are still in Editorial Assessment. Is it still necessary to wait?

(0) Thank | 仲夏宏峻

Editorial Assessment has been two months, seeing that everyone is like this, I have decided to wait a little longer

(0) Thank | 神古景苑

It has been 74 days, grass.

(0) Thank | ruiruiruirui

It has been 68 days, damn it.

(0) Thank | ruiruiruirui