Submitted 01-Dec-2024
Major Revision (16-Jan-2025)
Accept (20-Feb-2025)

(0) Thank | jugking

Submitted 16-Sep-2024
Major Revision (23-Oct-2024)
Accept (19-Nov-2024)
The editing efficiency is very high, with the manuscript sent for external review within three days.

(0) Thank | jugking

Submitted in November, published in August of the following year after two rounds of revisions.

(0) Thank | 阳光开朗小熊猫

23.06.30 submit
2024.1.17 major revision
2024.4.5 minor revision
2024.5.8 accept
It's not as good as before. The review process is much slower than before. It took nearly a year to be accepted, and I had to remind them several times in between, but it didn't seem to have much effect

(0) Thank | wingsandwin

2023.09.06 submit
2023.12.18 Major Revison
2024.01.18 a revision han been submitted
2024.04.04 Accept

(1) Thank | 料哥

2023.2.2 Submission
2023.5.11 Major Revision
2023.6.19 a revision has been submitted
2023.7.18 Minor Revision
2023.7.21 a revision has been submitted
2023.9.8 Minor Revision
2023.9.20 a revision has been submitted
2023.9.26 Accept
In general, not difficult, I hope the magazine will take me high

(1) Thank | 292725651

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for the external review process when you submitted to this journal. Have there been cases where two reviewers were assigned sequentially?

(0) Thank | wingsandwin

Is the external review of this journal first sent to one reviewer and then to another, or are both sent simultaneously? My submission was in "awaiting reviewer scores" for three weeks and then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment." Have you encountered this situation before?

(0) Thank | wingsandwin

Submission 2022-12-28
Major revision 2023-03-15
Minor revision 2023-06-01
Acceptance 2023-07-18

The major revision was given one month, but it was delayed due to some issues. The editor extended the deadline. The reviewer asked sharp questions, which took a lot of time to address in the major revision. The editor was very friendly and promptly answered any doubts.

(0) Thank | Brisk煜

Very slow and unable to contact anyone. It takes two months for the external review, and they only provide comments after sending two emails. After submitting the revised manuscript, the journal asked me to add a file, but the system already shows that the submission date has expired, and there is no button available for submission. I have also sent emails to inquire, but there has been no response.

(0) Thank | Doris

I hope that the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences can be improved by the end of the year.

(0) Thank | z照照

Return of review comments one month after submission, with acceptance in less than one review cycle. High editing efficiency.

(0) Thank | Jazzen