Please make a record of it, currently UR.

(2) Thank | 奎奎cheer

I received feedback about 40 days after submitting my manuscript, spent about two weeks revising it, and then it took one month for the second review to be accepted. The manuscript was basically sent for review on the same day it was submitted, so the process was very fast.

(1) Thank | 一般

Where is the submission address for this journal?

(0) Thank | SCI是我的命

The speed of the two-month review was okay, but with two reviewers, one was positive and the other not so positive but willing to make changes. In total, there were only 12 comments, but the editorial board still rejected the submission.

(0) Thank | Ryan9506

Were the modified texts in the resubmitted manuscript highlighted with a different color, such as red or yellow, or were they not highlighted with any color?

(0) Thank | Abraham1

Posted on March 13, 2023, rejected on May 9, 2023, with two reviewers. Both had minor comments, mainly asking for clarification on the model's boundary conditions and the reasonableness of certain assumptions. The editor rejected the submission but encouraged resubmission. After careful revisions and providing a response to the comments, I resubmitted on May 25, 2023. It was accepted on June 5, 2023, and I was asked to upload the images again. I uploaded them on the same day, and it was accepted on June 8, 2023.

(1) Thank | Tenet1

Posted on August 6, 2021, revised twice in between, accepted on May 15, 2022.

(0) Thank | Liuliu

Submitted on August 5, 2021, revised comments given on January 14, 2022, responded to revised comments on February 14, 2022, received second review on March 13, 2022, replied to second review on March 17, 2022, accepted on May 1, 2022! In total, it took less than 9 months to be accepted!

(0) Thank | liuliu

First trial, six months, rejected. There were only four or five opinions in total, and apart from the one about lack of innovation, the rest were insignificant. After such a long review period, there wasn't even a substantial suggestion to improve the paper, and it was rejected simply for lack of innovation. It's a waste of time to not gain anything. The rejection letter was signed by a responsible editor, but I don't even know who the editor handling the manuscript actually is. Are they afraid to sign their name?

(9) Thank | Dora Zhang

Submitted in mid-May of the 20th year, it took more than three months for the review. The first review was released in mid-August, and the revisions were made by the end of September. The final notification was received by the end of December, and it was finally accepted in February. It was published in May. The submission process took a whole year, which was exceptionally slow.

(8) Thank | Bruce2