After being rejected by editor Liu Delong, JHO switched to EHO and submitted to a collection that happened to be available at that time. However, the article remained stagnant in the hands of the responsible editor of that collection for over a month. After sending an inquiry letter, the article finally landed in the hands of editor Liu Delong, who showed extremely high efficiency. Kudos to Liu for his quick response!

(0) Thank | PanchoZ

Here are the submission deadlines for JHO and EHO:
JHO submitted first.

(0) Thank | PanchoZ

Just received a paper, which was transferred to me after being rejected by the sister journal JHO for review. After the transfer, it was not reviewed, but I was asked to supplement according to the dozens of opinions given by the 4 reviewers of JHO. After working hard to complete the supplement, it was sent back and another reviewer was found, who provided some additional opinions. After completing another round of supplements, it was sent back and accepted after a minor formatting revision. Overall, the quality of articles in this journal is uneven, with some good quality articles, but also some obvious cases of favoritism leading to poor reputation of the journal. The journal's speed is relatively fast, and in a rush to graduate, I agreed to transfer to EHO. To be honest, it was a bit of a loss to follow the dozens of review opinions from JHO and publish in EHO, but looking at the rising impact factor of the sister journal JHO, it is likely that this journal will also rise. Hopefully the journal will continue to improve, while publishing fewer low-quality articles!

(0) Thank | PanchoZ

5-18 Submission
6-3 Resubmission after format modification
6-8 Reviewer's comment
8-9 Revision
8-12 Resubmission
8-13 Reviewer's comment
8-26 Major revision
8-27 Resubmission
8-29 Invite another reviewer
8-30 Reviewer's comment
8-30 Minor revision
8-31 Resubmission again
9-2 Acceptance

(0) Thank | 萧赢