2020.9.22, submitted. It took 8 days for “with editor”. It has taken 35 days in total. It is still inviting the reviewers. Be careful to submit.

(8) Thank | Grubby

Do I need to pay for this journal?

(0) Thank | Dawud Shan

Please return proof a few days after accepting.

(0) Thank | Yang Sir

It is not an open-access journal, but follows a traditional subscription model.

(0) Thank | wiesen

Is this journal an OA journal?

(0) Thank | shunshun

Submit Apr 18, 2024
Accept Jul 24, 2024
The experience was good, the submission went smoothly. Hopefully next year, in 2024, it will be promoted to a higher tier.

(0) Thank | wiesen

Please be patient, brother. It seems like the reviewer has disappeared or forgotten to upload

(0) Thank | wiesen

The submission made at the end of February has been under review for three days. It is still under review at the end of May, so slow

(0) Thank | qingyu

Any big shots predicting this year's impact factor? Is there a possibility of it exceeding 10?

(0) Thank | wiesen

Sometimes it really depends on luck. Some editors do take longer to process articles, which can lead to such situations. In fact, the chief editor does have expectations regarding the timeliness of processing manuscripts. He requires us to check the secondary system at least once a week to process manuscripts. However, you should know that the editors handling the manuscripts are not professional editors, they are all university professors, and they do this mainly out of academic interest, so the chief editor's "requirements" are not easy to enforce. Most editors are very cooperative, and decisions on whether to submit for review or not are made relatively quickly. During the review process, if reviewers are delayed, we do our best to urge them or find new reviewers

(0) Thank | chris

Is there anyone here who is proficient in two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance? Can you help me analyze the spectrum?

(0) Thank | 芒顿小镇

Is your article currently being accepted?

(0) Thank | 江南大碑

Sharing my submission experience, it actually went quite quick

(0) Thank | 听曲散步

Why do we need to continue to review it when two people have already reviewed it?

(0) Thank | IMPROVE

Two reviewers

(0) Thank | 漫步云海涧

How many reviewers are there usually?

(0) Thank | IMPROVE

Thank you to the editors and reviewers. The review process was fast, and it was accepted over a month. The impact factor is very high, but not top. I hope to make it to the top next year.
Oct 04, 2023 submitted to journal
oct 6, 2023 with editor
oct 12, 2023 under review
oct 27, 2023 required reviews complete
nov 8, 2023 revise
nov 14, 2023 submitted to journal
nov 14,2023 with editor
nov 14, 2023 under review
nov 27, 2023 required reviews completed
nov 29, 2023 accept

(0) Thank | 漫步云海涧

Just submitted a review article today, hoping for a smooth review process

(0) Thank | 醉里挑灯看剑

10.22 submission
10.22 with editor, reminded once after 2 months
01.23 under review, minor revisions, returned in two weeks
02.23 reject, no reasons given. Truly a divine publication.

(0) Thank | 淅沥沥

After the third minor repair, acceptance.

(0) Thank | luting

2022.05 Submission
2022.09 Major revision
2022.11 Minor revision, completed in two weeks and returned
2022.12 Reviewer's comments returned, but status still under review
2023.03 Still under review, which means the editor hasn't looked at it for such a long time
What should I do? Should I remind them?

(0) Thank | luting

What's happening now? It's been three months with my editor.

(0) Thank | jackjjay

What is the current outcome? Is it still with the editor?

(0) Thank | jackjjay

May I ask how many reviewers are you?

(0) Thank | good1

I had a smooth submission. The reviewers only asked for modifications in terms of formatting and captions, there were no other issues.

(0) Thank | liuyang0495