5.5 Submission; 6.7 major revision; 6.30 revision submitted; 8.17 major revision; 9.12 revision submitted; 9.27 minor revision; 10.7 revision submitted; 10.21 accepted.

(13) Thank | juandejerry

Let me support the domestic high-level biomaterials journal, and share the submission process for your reference. 2020-08-20, submitted. Because I was not in the research group of the expert and worried about the domestic circle culture, so I chose the editor-in-chief Jian Yang of Pennsylvania State University; 2020-08-20, under review; 2020-09-12, minor revision; 2020-09-13, revised, with editor; 2020-09-16, accepted. It took 2 years in total for this research. We have completed some work on the interaction between polymer and cell which is easily ignored in the research of biomaterials, and identified the specific effector receptors on the cell surface. The comments of the reviewers were very positive, and I think it is the reason why the article was quickly accepted.

(10) Thank | 固执的北极熊

Has the latest impact factor of 2020 been released? Why is there still no query result?

(9) Thank | 紫气东来1

I think the opinions of the three reviewers are quite good, so why was it rejected?

(0) Thank | 东大泡芙小王子阿阿

Circle journal, judge by appearance, but rejection doesn't delay things.

(0) Thank | 匿名投稿

Which journal did you switch to? Thank you for the recommendation! Cheers.

(0) Thank | xxxxxxjjjj

Which journal did you switch to? Thank you for the recommendation!

(0) Thank | xxxxxxjjjj

It should be fine, just submitted. It will be reviewed by the editor within a week, but it may be a bit slow due to the summer vacation.

(0) Thank | Moon～～～

May I ask how you have been since then?

(0) Thank | bessage

After being rejected, I submitted to another journal and it was accepted. It is ranked in the top 12+ in the first district. Although the impact factor is not as high as Bioactive, it is still considered good. Keep up the good work.

(0) Thank | 号号

No one rejects the materials prepared for format changes quickly, I don't know whether to cry or laugh.

(0) Thank | 黄小生

Editor Zheng, submitted at 12 o'clock noon, rejected after 2 hours in the afternoon, not bad, haha.

(0) Thank | 黄小生

Why was I rejected?

(0) Thank | mingmingjiu-09

0528 Still with editor

(0) Thank | Gbbb

20240520 submitted
20240520 with editor
20240524 with editor
The journal's website says the first decision is supposed to be made within 3 days, but it feels like it's taking longer than before. Is this bad news?

(0) Thank | Gbbb

Now we can't choose, but we used to be able to

(0) Thank | liyifan1996

May I ask if you have chosen the editor Yang Jian from Pennsylvania State University in the United States yourself?

(0) Thank | 搞科研的小郑

Hello, how do you choose a chief editor?

(0) Thank | 搞科研的小郑

How to choose the chief editor actively?

(0) Thank | 搞科研的小郑

Is the impact factor expected to exceed 20 this year? Are domestic journals just journals of social courtesy?

(0) Thank | 骆驼2021

Why were all the reviewer's comments modifications and still the paper was rejected?

(0) Thank | LYH不要996

Submitted twice and rejected both times, watching as the magazine score increased from 8 to 18. Finally submitted what I thought was my best work and finally got what I wanted. Overall, the magazine has a very fast processing speed, and rejection doesn't waste any time. The reviewers' comments are quite professional and can indeed improve the quality of the article.

2024.01.09 Submitted
2024.02.14 Required review completed
2024.02.16 Major Revision (four reviewers, all very positive)
2024.02.28 Revision Submitted (47 pages, over 7000 words)
2024.02.29 With editor
2024.03.21 Accept
2024.02.28

For reference only
Hope the magazine continues to improve and breaks the 20-point threshold soon

(1) Thank | Samael

1. Rejection after initial submission, rejection after external review, with feedback from three reviewers as follows:
1. ****** typical phrases. However, some significant revisions are needed before consideration for publication.
2. ****** typical phrases. However, there are still some shortcomings in the manuscript that need improvement. Specific suggestions and issues are outlined below:
3. ****** typical phrases. However, some additional content is needed in certain areas to aid reader comprehension. The following issues should be addressed for publication.
In conclusion, the quality and standards of this journal are evident to all. As a shining example of domestic research, it has indeed made significant contributions to our country's scientific research level, and is worth submitting to

(2) Thank | 号号

How are you, buddy?

(0) Thank | Samael

2023.12.13 under review
The date has been updated frequently these days, I wonder what's going on

(0) Thank | 金狼