Submitted on January 3; under review on January 8; minor revision required within five days on January 20; major revision required within ten days on January 30; revision submitted on February 7; Accepted on February 8.

(1) Thank | tt88

The manuscript was submitted on July 24. 10 days were given for the major revision on August 19. The revised manuscript was submitted on August 27, and it was accepted on August 30.

(11) Thank | whenwe

Accepted, it has been almost a month since submission. There were two reviewers, one requested additional experiments which were completed as requested. The other reviewer raised minor textual issues which were addressed accordingly. Not sure if it will be accepted, but hopeful.

(0) Thank | 耿耿1234

I can't hold it anymore. The previous talk was so promising, but then they dropped the bombshell - hired in 22 days. Hilarious.

(0) Thank | Zyzpkilly

Submitted a review article, worked through the Lunar New Year holiday and the review process took only 50 days. The editor had quite a few requirements.

(0) Thank | 砂石

Hello, do you need a whole body film for WB?

(0) Thank | accept!!!!!!!!

Going from 7 to 8? What are you thinking? It's just a MDPI journal!

(0) Thank | 德云小生

The editor is very responsible and basically replies to our questions on the same day. The entire processing process is efficient, with major revisions in the first round and minor revisions in the second round, which are quickly accepted by external editors. For those who are eager to graduate, this journal is worth considering. There are also a lot of materials needed for publication, and for collaborations with multiple institutions, the collaboration method needs to be clarified, the specific contributions of the authors need to be stated, and the original figures for Western Blot images need to be uploaded.

(1) Thank | 小小科

This is my first time submitting to this journal. The editorial board and reviewers are very responsible and efficient. The first review took 12 days, and the second review after revisions took 2 days. Academic editor Professor Robert V. Stahelin also carefully checked the entire manuscript and provided several suggestions for revision. The editorial board conducted 4 reviews and 4 revisions, ensuring strict quality control and timely communication with the authors. The review process was fast and efficient, progressing smoothly even on weekends and holidays, with a total of 22 days from submission to publication. I think this journal is excellent

(1) Thank | Shiping

Do you need a full body Western?

(0) Thank | asdfghlkmn

Did you receive it later?

(0) Thank | momo999

3.8 Submission
3.9 Under review
3.23 Received 1 recommendation, reviewer suggested minor revisions
4.3 Rejected, reason cited was the manuscript did not fit the journal's theme

中文翻译：
3.8 投稿
3.9 審査中
3.23 收到1個意見，審稿人建議輕微修改
4.3 拒絕，理由是稿件和期刊主題不符合

(Note: "desk reject" does not have a direct translation in Japanese, so it is left in English in the

(0) Thank | qtl

The reviewers were very serious, and the submission was accepted
Submission to First Decision (Days)
32
Submission to Publication (Days)
62
Round of Revision
2

(0) Thank | wwwwwaaaannnn

How long does it take to revise from acceptance, thank you

(0) Thank | wwwwwaaaannnn

Speed is average, it's the fourth day of final review, ing

(0) Thank | wwwwwaaaannnn

Do you have any discount coupons?

(0) Thank | wwwwwaaaannnn

Want to invest in biomolecules?

(0) Thank | wwwwwaaaannnn

The review process is fast, but I still don't know the result. It's been half a month already

(0) Thank | 龙宽九段

投稿于11月，进行小修于12月，接收于1月，出版于2月。编辑非常负责，唯一的不足是从接受到出版花费了一个多月的时间。编辑一直在纠结一些形式上的问题，反复多次修改后才最终通过。

(0) Thank | bigb

Maybe it's just my bad luck, but I have encountered editors and junior editors who work very slowly, resulting in a poor experience.

There were very few comments from the two reviewers in the first review, and it took nearly a month for the editor to handle it. Additional reviewers were added, but another month passed without any progress.

(0) Thank | GG2020

"2022 upgraded version or return to the second zone." translates to "Upgraded version in 2022 or back to the second zone."

(0) Thank | 何小米

Research on biomarkers, a special issue was submitted. The efficiency was very high, with a first review taking 20 days and involving 4 reviewers. One of the reviewers raised many statistical questions, which required additional analysis. The second review took 4 days, with 3 reviewers providing additional comments mainly on language and formatting issues. After revisions were made, the paper was accepted within 2 days and underwent a 2-day proofreading process before being published online on the same day. The status changes in the system were as follows:

Pending review (Aug 26)
Under review (Aug 30)
Pending major revision (Sep 19)
Resubmit 1st round (Oct 4)
Pending minor revision (Oct 8)
Resubmit 2nd round (Oct 10)
Pending editor decision (Oct 10)
Accept (Oct 12)
Proof resubmit (Oct 14)

(0) Thank | robinchen95

What reasons were given for the rejection of the manuscript?

(0) Thank | 苑

I checked the current impact factor, and it has surpassed a series of well-known MDPI journals such as Nanomaterials, Pharmaceutics, and Int J Mol Sci. However, their prices are cheaper than those journals. It is estimated that the impact factor will be close to 7 or 8 in the next year. Overall, it should be the best choice among MDPI journals!

(2) Thank | 半π

Good reputation, strict review comments, it can be considered a magazine that can pass through, an upgraded version should be able to reach the second district.

(0) Thank | 昊晨