Submission complete - Format review - Editor initial review - Peer review - Review completed - Editor final review - Author revision

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Almost all freely submitted manuscripts that meet the academic standards for publication after review need to be returned to the authors for revisions before publication. This may involve compressing the length of the article, redesigning tables, improving the quality of illustrations, and limiting the use of irregular abbreviations. However, manuscripts returned to authors for revision do not guarantee acceptance, as the final decision depends on whether the authors can make the necessary modifications to the key content and presentation of the article to meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors. 

Materials typically returned to authors for revision include the original manuscript, reviewers' comments, and a covering letter from the editor. Upon receiving the revised manuscript, authors should carefully read the covering letter and reviewers' comments. They should then consider whether they are willing or able to accept the suggestions of the reviewers or editor and make revisions accordingly. The likelihood of acceptance can be deduced from both the editor's response letter and the reviewers' revision suggestions. Revisions should not be rushed, with authors advised to carefully read and understand the issues raised by the reviewers. Each point raised by the reviewers should be addressed individually, with specific references to the changes made in the revised manuscript (page, lines). Authors should respond to the editor, thanking them for their suggestions and explaining any changes not made based on the modification suggestions

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the review process like?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

What is the process of exchanging vows?

(0) Thank | 平原文波