Submitted on January 18, accepted on August 10. The process was relatively bumpy. There were three reviewers in the first review, and the comments were okay. I resubmitted it after earnestly answering them. However, one reviewer might be added for each round of revisions, and there were new review comments raised, which were revised three times before and after. There were 6 reviewers in total, and the editor said that he would reject it if the reviewers were still dissatisfied with the manuscript...

(2) Thank | 森森森

Being affected by the epidemic, from the submission of the manuscript in April, it was only in July that the first review comments of the two reviewers were received. They were all relatively positive. The editor required major revisions. The manuscript was returned 7 days later, it was accepted 3 days later, it was proofed on the same day, and it went online the next day. It was pretty fast at the later stage. This journal prefers the innovative researches in new fields.

(2) Thank | hands1103

The content of the article is about multi-omics study of medicinal fungi. The journal pays more attention to the novelty of article content. The editor is very responsible and the review cycle is short. After minor revisions, if the reviewers are satisfied with the revision, it generally can be online within one or two weeks.

(3) Thank | 喜捣捣

While there are many manuscripts in medical agronomy, there are not many engineering techniques. The results of the review are sent after one month.

(0) Thank | 风雪星月夜

There was no second review, and the first review accepted minor revisions.

(0) Thank | marry

May I ask if there is a result now?

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱

It has been a week since RRC and still no news, feeling anxious.

(0) Thank | 温和的常常

Friend, how are you doing? I have been waiting for the manuscript review for six months and it is still under review. I am so frustrated, it has already delayed me for a year. Have you withdrawn your submission? My boss asked me to withdraw mine.

(0) Thank | 老人家

Accept good luck, hope to accept it.

(0) Thank | quyang

Specific animal experiment ethics approval numbers can be provided for Ethics.

(0) Thank | SunnyE

On February 6th, it was sent.

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱

Has it been updated? I have also resubmitted it for review after major revisions. ??

(0) Thank | 兰博基尼葱

20240828 submitted
20240928 format revised and with editor
20241116 under review, sent to 10 people, 2 accepted the review
20241127 one review completed, the other did not respond
20241220 sent to 70 people, 6 accepted to review
20241226 received 3 review comments, not many, but still required major revisions, given 21 days to revise
Received feedback from other experts before 20250116, but the editor did not send an email, added to return
20250113 received revision comments and with editor
20250131 still in the editor's hands, not sent for review, so tired, already delayed for half a year, wearing a mask of pain.

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱

Hello, I would like to ask about the requirement of Compliance with Ethics Requirements for submission. My research involves animal experiments using mice.

(0) Thank | SLBYZDQ

Hello, I would like to ask what is meant by "Compliance with Ethics Requirements" when submitting a manuscript. I conducted an experiment on mice.

(0) Thank | SLBYZDQ

It's still the same as before and hasn't changed at all.

(0) Thank | kexiong liu

It's still the same, no changes. Urging for the manuscript didn't help either.

(0) Thank | kexiong liu

Hello, may I ask how long the second review will take? Is it around 20 days?

(0) Thank | DRChen001

Hello, may I ask how are you doing now?

(0) Thank | DRChen001

Good luck~

(0) Thank | 芷韵

The initial technical review lasted for 3 months, during which there were several contacts for formatting modifications. Half a month after submission, feedback on the manuscript was received from four reviewers, all of whom suggested minor revisions. After resubmitting within 20 days, the manuscript was accepted in less than a month. It was edited the same night it was accepted, with a 48-hour deadline for revisions. The article was submitted for publication fees 2 days later and was online on the 3rd day. Overall, the initial process took longer, but subsequent steps were very prompt. The journal has a high impact factor and offers excellent value for money. It is a reliable journal for those about to graduate. Highly recommended!

(1) Thank | marry

Could you please clarify if the response letter is individual for each reviewer, or if it is written as a whole and then the editor divides the content?

(0) Thank | 宇兰酱

The second review invited the 4 reviewers from the first review, but only 2 of them completed the review. The other two have consistently refused to review, what should we do?

(0) Thank | kexiong liu

Good luck, good luck!!!

(0) Thank | 芷韵

Good luck, good luck.

(0) Thank | 科研界我是进不去了