There were 2 reviewers in the first review, we received the review comments in one month, and a major revision was required; it was revised and submitted after one month, and accepted directly after two weeks; we also got the invitation for submitting a cover image, and after the cover was submitted, it was accepted as the inside cover. The overall efficiency was very high, and the review opinions and editors were still very responsible. The quality of the articles in this journal is not low, and a lot of work were done quite comprehensively, which may have something to do with the high requirements of the editor-in-chief K. Jensen. I don't know why the impact factor can't rise. I hope that it will get attention from more people in the future.

(0) Thank | dljzxdljzx

The efficiency of the editor was very high. 2020.6.16 I submitted a manuscript for first, which was sent for review soon; 2020-7-6 review comments were received, requiring major revision, and there were two reviewers; 2020-7-20 the revised manuscript was returned and it was sent for review on the same day; 2020-7-29 acceptance.

(3) Thank | 风信子1926

Now four people are reviewing the manuscript, and one person has provided feedback. I'm not sure about the current speed, as it has typically taken around three weeks in the past. I have submitted two articles before.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

2025.04.01 Submission 
2025.04.03 Under review 
Currently, only one expert is reviewing the manuscript.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

Xiao Xiu has been waiting for a month for the repairs, but there is still no news. What the hell!

(0) Thank | hayy

Professor Ian R. Baxendale, about twenty days for review.

(0) Thank | 想吃粘豆包

May I ask who is the editor? How long is the review process?

(0) Thank | undefined

It's good, this journal is quite inclusive, the reviewers and editors are nice, they can point out minor issues with the paper, recommend it!

(0) Thank | 刘志伟

Excuse me, which editor?

(0) Thank | dbdota

Prof. Dr. Francesca Paradisi

(0) Thank | Stro.Energy渣渣怪兽

Choosing the right name is very important.

(0) Thank | fj_blueice

Submitted on May 24, 2024
First-round revisions on June 9, 2024, with two reviewers
First-round feedback returned on June 14, 2024
Accepted on June 24, 2024
The process was very fast, with editors making immediate decisions upon receiving the manuscript on the same day.

(0) Thank | Stro.Energy渣渣怪兽

Submitted on November 16th, rejected on November 22nd and resubmitted. Received two sets of reviewers' comments

(0) Thank | 一头牛

Submission on July 7th, feedback on August 25th, three feedbacks, two modifications and one rejection.
Returned on September 19th, accepted on September 24th. Only one reviewer was assigned upon return, and their feedback required modifications

(0) Thank | 一头牛

Posted on March 23rd, repaired on June 8th, and accepted on June 28th.

(0) Thank | 喝什么呀？

The speed of reading is fast, and the paper was submitted to Area 2 of the Chemistry Division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. However, the recently updated impact factor has decreased from 5.2 to 3.9. Hopefully, it can be maintained in Area 2.

(0) Thank | Jik.bd

Everyone says this journal is fast, but there are no relevant articles yet. I tried submitting, and they will accept it after major revisions. Overall, the processing speed is quite fast, but it might be slow to find reviewers without relevant articles. On the 28th, I just updated the impact factor and discussed with my roommates. I couldn't sleep at night, so I checked and found out that it was accepted, and I was very happy with the first article. Thanks to editor Wang Haihui.
4.5: Checking submission
4.8: Initial assessment
4.10: With editor
4.12: In peer review
4.18: With editor
4.20: In peer review
4.25: With editor
4.27: In peer review
5.2: With editor
5.4: In peer review
5.21: With editor
5.21: Major revisions
6.4: A revision has been submitted
6.5: Revision
6.9: Initial assessment
6.10: With editor
6.11: In peer review
6.28: Accepted

(0) Thank | Jik.bd

2023.3.27 major revisions
2023.4.19 resubmit
2023.4.19 with editor
2023.4.26 in peer review
2023.4.30 with editor
2023.5.3 in peer review
2023.5.7 with editor
2023.5.8 accept
Two months, overall speed is acceptable!

(0) Thank | 那啊尼

2023.2.12 submitted
2023.2.20 with editor
2023.2.21 in peer review
2023.2.26 with editor
2023.2.27 in peer review
Currently, there is no news.

(0) Thank | 那啊尼

"The ninth day was submitted for review."

(0) Thank | 那啊尼

The eighth day has just arrived in the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | 那啊尼

It has been 6 days for me too, and it hasn't reached the editor yet.

(0) Thank | 那啊尼

It has been 7 days and I am still at the initial assessment stage. Does this mean it's not going well? I saw comments saying it's quite fast, but why am I stuck here?

(0) Thank | 蓝水白鲨

I have been submitting for 3 months and looking for reviewers. In the end, 2 accepted and 2 rejected. The editor declined.

(0) Thank | xjj10

Recently, I have published three articles in a row. The impact factor of RCE is steadily increasing, and it has also been upgraded to the second tier in terms of classification, indicating a strong trend of surpassing IECR. I have published many articles in IECR before, but now I am shifting my focus to RCE. After all, IECR's classification has dropped rapidly, while RCE remains strong.

(1) Thank | cctrt1984