It is suggested to be cautious about investing in this magazine, it is best to boycott this garbage magazine! It is a very trashy magazine! After external review for 3 months, make revisions and conduct additional experiments according to the reviewers' opinions before resubmitting. Two months later, after the second review, make further revisions and resubmit. Suddenly rejected 20 days later, without providing any reasons based on the reviewers' opinions. The whole process took nearly 7 months.

(0) Thank | 冰春mm

Yes, this magazine is quite rubbish. I submitted an article, which took half a year and underwent two major revisions. The reviewers had no comments and even said "very nice." However, the editorial department rejected it, saying the images did not meet the standards. Why didn't they say so earlier? This is clearly a scam! I suggest boycotting this rubbish journal!!!

(0) Thank | 冰春mm

It's been 4 days, still in initial check

(0) Thank | 仲夏美媛

He vetoed it, saying that the original picture you provided did not meet the requirements

(0) Thank | 墟散云泽

Is there any association with the magazine? I also encountered this problem

(0) Thank | 风啸香薇

Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: Tumor
Experience: Submitted a review article in mid-August 2023, received a Major Revision after one and a half months, accepted after two months of revisions, and took a total of 4 months. Overall, the journal's review level is relatively high, the reviewers are very professional, the requirements are strict, and the review speed is very fast. I would like to ask how long it will take for this journal to be indexed by WOS after being online?

(0) Thank | 多罗浩迪

There is none

(0) Thank | 凌霄天空

No requirements

(0) Thank | 凌霄天空

After completing the experiment and undergoing a second review, the materials are submitted

(0) Thank | 墟散云泽

Complete the experiment, submit all original materials after the second review

(0) Thank | 墟散云泽

Do you receive and then provide original data? My minor edits also require original data

(0) Thank | 风啸香薇

Are you asking for the original data?

(0) Thank | 风啸香薇

Is it because of the original data or the problem of the pictures during the supplementary experiment that the article was rejected?

(0) Thank | 风啸香薇

Two major revisions, oh no, I thought there was no hope, but the reviewer unexpectedly let it go, I want to thank him so much

(0) Thank | 凌霄天空

2023.5.15 Submitted
2023.5.15 Intial check
2023.5.15 Awiting AE assignment
2023.5.17 Under review
2023.7.17 Major Revision (Due on 9.15)
2023.9.15 Revision submitted
2023.9.15 Initial check
2023.9.18 Under review
2023.10.10 Major Revision (Due on 12.9)
2023.11.17 Revision submitted
2023.11.17 Initial check
2023.11.22 Under review
2023.12.13 Accept

(0) Thank | 凌霄天空

Have you voted?

(0) Thank | 半月小蕊

How long does the external audit take? It has been one month since the external audit began. How much longer will it take to finish?

(0) Thank | 白云紫萍

It has been suggested to transfer

(0) Thank | 犬走千风

The article is under review

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

One day has undergone review, what is going on? Is it being sent for external review? Or is it still under internal review?

(0) Thank | 犬走千风

Am I in the reviewing state as well? Or is it an internal audit?

(0) Thank | 犬走千风

Can I know how long it will take for this magazine awaiting AE assignment?

(0) Thank | 犬走千风

I would like to ask how long it will take for this magazine "awaiting AE assignment" to be ready?

(0) Thank | 犬走千风

Hello, how do I submit the original images for WB? Do all images need to be marked with lanes? What could be the reason for rejection by the editor? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 宗室平乐

It's not a lane marker, it's a whole sheet of film with markers on it

(0) Thank | 墟散云泽