This journal is not good; the self-citation rate is still high, it is best to select other journals.

(0) Thank | asdjkl

I feel like I'm in the same situation as you, it's like riding a tiger and hard to get off

(0) Thank | 太山叶彤

The review process is indeed slow. The first submission went through peer review for six months. After reminders, feedback for revisions was given in about a month. Upon resubmission, feedback was provided within four weeks. After waiting for another three months, and two reminders, feedback was finally received a month later. I have no idea when the next review will be. It's almost been a year. I'm not sure whether to withdraw the submission or not

(0) Thank | 太山叶彤

For some unknown reason, I received a rejection letter 4 months after submitting my manuscript, stating that it wasn't suitable for publication. It feels really frustrating and I wouldn't recommend submitting to them. For those in a hurry, steer clear of this potential pitfall

(0) Thank | 忆莲小郎君

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" as the title

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Often, the need to submit is initiated from top to bottom. Understanding your own article at a 2-3 gradient is sufficient

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Do you need to set different levels of journals for selection? How many gradients are usually set?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

How many alternative journals are typically selected for each journal ranking?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

This journal is not suitable, the self-citation rate is still a bit high, it is better to submit to another journal

(0) Thank | 巴蜀清雅